Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474107›Full record

ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2023

Phase angle and cellular health: inflammation and oxidative damage.

Bruna Ramos da Silva, Camila E Orsso, Maria Cristina Gonzalez, Juliana Maria Faccioli Sicchieri, Mirele Savegnago Mialich, Alceu A Jordao, Carla M Prado

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruna Ramos da SilvaDepartment of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8674-5753
Camila E OrssoDepartment of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5989-0528
Maria Cristina GonzalezPostgraduate Program in Health and Behavior, Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3901-8182
Juliana Maria Faccioli SicchieriDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Nutrition and Metabolism, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7523-953X
Mirele Savegnago MialichDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Nutrition and Metabolism, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6647-7774
Alceu A JordaoDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Nutrition and Metabolism, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1288-0802
Carla M PradoDepartment of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Carla.prado@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-3609-5641
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversidade Católica de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase angle is a composite measure that combines two raw bioelectrical impedance analysis measures: resistance and reactance. Phase angle has been considered an indicator of cellular health, integrity, and hydration. As inflammation and oxidative stress can damage cellular structures, phase angle has potential utility in early detecting inflammatory and oxidative status. Herein, we aimed to critically review the current understanding on the determinants of phase angle and its relationship with markers of inflammation and oxidative stress. We also discussed the potential role of phase angle in detecting chronic inflammation and related adverse outcomes. Several factors have been identified as predictors of phase angle, including age, sex, extracellular to intracellular water ratio, and fat-free mass. In addition to these factors, body mass index (BMI) also seems to influence phase angle. Available data also show that lower phase angle values are correlated (negligible to high correlation coefficients) with higher c-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 in studies involving the general and aging populations, as well as patients with chronic conditions. Although fewer studies have evaluated the relationship between phase angle and markers of oxidative stress, available data also suggest that phase angle has potential to be used as an indicator (for screening) of oxidative damage. Future studies including diverse populations and bioelectrical impedance devices are required to confirm the validity and accuracy of phase angle as a marker of inflammation and oxidative stress for clinical use.

Indexed as

AgingBody CompositionBody Mass IndexHumansInflammationOxidative StressBioelectrical impedance analysisChronic diseasesInflammationOxidative stressPhase angle

Identifiers

PMID36474107
PMCPMC9735064
OpenAlexW4311292708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.