ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023
Convolutional Neural Networks for Classifying Cervical Cancer Types Using Histological Images.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing cervical cancer diagnosis with a hybrid deep neural network and progressive resizing on pap smear WSIs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI for cervical cancer screening on whole slide images: opportunities with open-source simple tools.Pathologica · 2026Article
- Development and validation of deep learning for predicting the growth of ovarian cancer organoids.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Histopathological Analysis for Predicting Immunotherapy Response in Cutaneous Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Tools for Supporting Histopathologic and Molecular Characterization of Gynecological Cancers: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Ultrasound-based machine learning model to predict the risk of endometrial cancer among postmenopausal women.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Review
- Review
- Deep dive into deep learning methods for cervical cancer detection and classification.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025Review
- Deep learning models for cervical cancer subtyping using whole slide images.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- AI-augmented pathology: the experience of transfer learning and intra-domain data diversity in breast cancer metastasis detection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in digital pathology for gynecological cancers.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Application and clinical efficacy of comprehensive nursing intervention in pelvic floor and bladder function recovery post-cervical cancer surgery.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus at the first trimester: machine-learning algorithms.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Prediction of prognosis using artificial intelligence-based histopathological image analysis in patients with soft tissue sarcomas.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Deep Learning-Based Recognition of Cervical Squamous Interepithelial Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. The diagnosis and classification of cancer are extremely important, as it influences the optimal treatment and length of survival. The objective was to develop and validate a diagnosis system based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) that identifies cervical malignancies and provides diagnostic interpretability. A total of 8496 labeled histology images were extracted from 229 cervical specimens (cervical squamous cell carcinoma, SCC, n = 37; cervical adenocarcinoma, AC, n = 8; nonmalignant cervical tissues, n = 184). AlexNet, VGG-19, Xception, and ResNet-50 with five-fold cross-validation were constructed to distinguish cervical cancer images from nonmalignant images. The performance of CNNs was quantified in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Six pathologists were recruited to make a comparison with the performance of CNNs. Guided Backpropagation and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) were deployed to highlight the area of high malignant probability. The Xception model had excellent performance in identifying cervical SCC and AC in test sets. For cervical SCC, AUC was 0.98 (internal validation) and 0.974 (external validation). For cervical AC, AUC was 0.966 (internal validation) and 0.958 (external validation). The performance of CNNs falls between experienced and inexperienced pathologists. Grad-CAM and Guided Gard-CAM ensured diagnoses interpretability by highlighting morphological features of malignant changes. CNN is efficient for histological image classification tasks of distinguishing cervical malignancies from benign tissues and could highlight the specific areas of concern. All these findings suggest that CNNs could serve as a diagnostic tool to aid pathologic diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.