Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36474087›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

Convolutional Neural Networks for Classifying Cervical Cancer Types Using Histological Images.

Yi-Xin Li, Feng Chen, Jiao-Jiao Shi, Yu-Li Huang, Mei Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Deep dive into deep learning methods for cervical cancer detection and classification.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Role of artificial intelligence in digital pathology for gynecological cancers.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Xin Li *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xinhua Hospital Chongming Branch, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Feng Chen *Department of Pathology, Xinhua Hospital Chongming Branch, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jiao-Jiao ShiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xinhua Hospital Chongming Branch, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Li HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xinhua Hospital Chongming Branch, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Mei WangDepartment of Gynecology, Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai Pudong New Area, Shanghai, 202150, China. 2906499588@qq.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7991-8468
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNPudong New Area People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. The diagnosis and classification of cancer are extremely important, as it influences the optimal treatment and length of survival. The objective was to develop and validate a diagnosis system based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) that identifies cervical malignancies and provides diagnostic interpretability. A total of 8496 labeled histology images were extracted from 229 cervical specimens (cervical squamous cell carcinoma, SCC, n = 37; cervical adenocarcinoma, AC, n = 8; nonmalignant cervical tissues, n = 184). AlexNet, VGG-19, Xception, and ResNet-50 with five-fold cross-validation were constructed to distinguish cervical cancer images from nonmalignant images. The performance of CNNs was quantified in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Six pathologists were recruited to make a comparison with the performance of CNNs. Guided Backpropagation and Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) were deployed to highlight the area of high malignant probability. The Xception model had excellent performance in identifying cervical SCC and AC in test sets. For cervical SCC, AUC was 0.98 (internal validation) and 0.974 (external validation). For cervical AC, AUC was 0.966 (internal validation) and 0.958 (external validation). The performance of CNNs falls between experienced and inexperienced pathologists. Grad-CAM and Guided Gard-CAM ensured diagnoses interpretability by highlighting morphological features of malignant changes. CNN is efficient for histological image classification tasks of distinguishing cervical malignancies from benign tissues and could highlight the specific areas of concern. All these findings suggest that CNNs could serve as a diagnostic tool to aid pathologic diagnosis.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervix UteriFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerCervical cancerComputer visionConvolutional neural networksDeep learningHistopathological images

Identifiers

PMID36474087
PMCPMC10039125
OpenAlexW4311649172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.