Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36473978›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2023

Geometric tumor embolic budding characterizes inflammatory breast cancer.

Arnav P Modi, Julie P T Nguyen, Justin Wang, Jonathan S Ahn, William A Libling, Jacob M Klein, Preeanka Mazumder, Sanford H Barsky

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Arnav P ModiCancer Center and Institute for Personalized Medicine, California University of Science and Medicine, 1501 Violet Street, Colton, CA, 92324, USA.
Julie P T NguyenCancer Center and Institute for Personalized Medicine, California University of Science and Medicine, 1501 Violet Street, Colton, CA, 92324, USA.
Justin WangCancer Center and Institute for Personalized Medicine, California University of Science and Medicine, 1501 Violet Street, Colton, CA, 92324, USA.
Jonathan S AhnCancer Center and Institute for Personalized Medicine, California University of Science and Medicine, 1501 Violet Street, Colton, CA, 92324, USA.
William A LiblingCancer Center and Institute for Personalized Medicine, California University of Science and Medicine, 1501 Violet Street, Colton, CA, 92324, USA.
Jacob M KleinCancer Center and Institute for Personalized Medicine, California University of Science and Medicine, 1501 Violet Street, Colton, CA, 92324, USA.
Preeanka MazumderCancer Center and Institute for Personalized Medicine, California University of Science and Medicine, 1501 Violet Street, Colton, CA, 92324, USA.
Sanford H BarskyCancer Center and Institute for Personalized Medicine, California University of Science and Medicine, 1501 Violet Street, Colton, CA, 92324, USA. sbarsky@mmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3760-4989
Meharry Medical College · US

Funding

U.S. Department of Defense BC024258U.S. Department of Defense BC053405U.S. Department of Defense BC990959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is characterized by numerous tumor emboli especially within dermal lymphatics. The explanation remains a mystery.

methodsThis study combines experimental studies with two different IBC xenografts with image algorithmic studies utilizing human tissue microarrays (TMAs) of IBC vs non-IBC cases to support a novel hypothesis to explain IBC's sina qua non signature of florid lymphovascular emboli.

resultsIn the human TMAs, compared to tumor features like nuclear grade (size), mitosis and Ki-67 immunoreactivity which show that IBC is only modestly more proliferative with larger nuclei than non-IBC, what really sets IBC apart is the markedly greater number of tumor emboli and distinctly smaller emboli whose numbers indicate geometric or exponential differences between IBC and non-IBC. In the experimental xenograft studies, Mary-X gives rise to tight spheroids in vitro which exhibit dynamic budding into smaller daughter spheroids whereas Karen-X exhibits only loose non-budding aggregates. Furthermore Mary-X emboli also bud dramatically into smaller daughter emboli in vivo. The mechanism that regulates this involves the generation of E-cad/NTF1, a calpain-mediated cleavage 100 kDa product of 120 kDa full length membrane E-cadherin. Inhibiting this calpain-mediated cleavage of E-cadherin by blocking either the calpain site of cleavage (SC) or the site of binding (SB) with specific decapeptides that both penetrate the cell membrane and mimic either the cleavage site or the binding site on E-cadherin, inhibits the generation of E-cad/NTF1 in a dose-dependent manner, reduces spheroid compactness and decreases budding.

conclusionSince E-cad/NFT1 retains the p120ctn binding site but loses the α-and β-catenin sites, promoting its 360° distribution around the cell's membrane, the vacilating levels of this molecule trigger budding of both the spheroids as well as the emboli. Recurrent and geometric budding of parental emboli into daughter emboli then would account for the plethora of emboli seen in IBC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsInflammatory Breast NeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingAnimalsCadherinsCalpainFemaleHumansSpheroids, CellularCadherinsCalpainCalpain-mediated proteolysis of E-cadherinE-cadherin fragmentsIBCLymphovascular tumor emboliSpheroidgenesisTumor embolic budding

Identifiers

PMID36473978
PMCPMC9734724
OpenAlexW4311282453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.