Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36473959›Full record

Observational studyClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2023

Orthostatic blood pressure adaptations, aortic stiffness, and central hemodynamics in the general population: insights from the Malmö Offspring Study (MOS).

Madeleine Johansson, Artur Fedorowski, Jens Jordan, Gunnar Engström, Peter M Nilsson, Viktor Hamrefors

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Orthostatic hypertension-too much of a good thing.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Exaggerated blood pressure response to standing in young-to-middle-age subjects: prevalence and factors involved.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madeleine JohanssonClinical Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences-Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease, Lund University, P.O. Box 50332, 202 13, Malmö, Sweden. madeleine.johansson@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-9057-9148
Artur FedorowskiClinical Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences-Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease, Lund University, P.O. Box 50332, 202 13, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5352-6327
Jens JordanInstitute of Aerospace Medicine, German Aerospace Center, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4518-0706
Gunnar EngströmClinical Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences-Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease, Lund University, P.O. Box 50332, 202 13, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8618-9152
Peter M NilssonClinical Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences-Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease, Lund University, P.O. Box 50332, 202 13, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5652-8459
Viktor HamreforsClinical Research Center, Department of Clinical Sciences-Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease, Lund University, P.O. Box 50332, 202 13, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8475-0866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeArterial stiffness is independently associated with orthostatic hypotension in older individuals. The relationship between orthostatic blood pressure adaptation and aortic stiffness has not been thoroughly examined in a younger population. We investigated the relationship between orthostatic blood pressure adaptations, central aortic hemodynamics, and aortic stiffness in a cohort of predominantly younger and middle-aged adults.

methodsWe analyzed an observational, population-based study of 5259 individuals living in Malmö, Sweden. We related aortic stiffness and central hemodynamics assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and pulse wave analysis at the arteria radialis using Sphygmocor to orthostatic blood pressure adaptation after 3 min standing.

resultsThe mean age of the population was 41.9 ± 14.5 years, and 52.1% were women. We observed the highest aortic stiffness and central aortic blood pressure measurements in the lowest and highest quartiles of orthostatic systolic blood pressure differences (p < 0.001). Aortic stiffness and central aortic blood pressure gradually decreased across increasing quartiles of orthostatic diastolic blood pressure difference (p < 0.001). After full adjustment, orthostatic diastolic blood pressure remained significantly associated with aortic stiffness (p = 0.001) and central aortic blood pressure (p < 0.001), whereas orthostatic systolic blood pressure was significantly associated only with central aortic systolic blood pressure (p = 0.009). No significant associations were found between subclinical orthostatic hypotension, aortic stiffness, and central hemodynamics.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that altered blood pressure responses to orthostatic challenges, both blood pressure reductions and blood pressure increases, are independently and inversely associated with markers of aortic stiffness (vascular aging) in a predominantly young to middle-aged population.

Indexed as

Hypotension, OrthostaticVascular StiffnessAdultAgedBlood PressureFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulse Wave AnalysisAortic stiffnessArterial stiffnessBlood pressureEpidemiologyOrthostatic hypotensionPopulation studyVascular aging

Identifiers

PMID36473959
PMCPMC9984326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.