Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36473701›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2022

NLoed: A Python Package for Nonlinear Optimal Experimental Design in Systems Biology.

Nathan Braniff, Taylor Pearce, Zixuan Lu, Michael Astwood, William S R Forrest, Cody Receno, Brian Ingalls

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nathan BraniffDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, OntarioN2L 3G1, Canada.
Taylor PearceDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, OntarioN2L 3G1, Canada.
Zixuan LuDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, OntarioN2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1407-097X
Michael AstwoodDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, OntarioN2L 3G1, Canada.
William S R ForrestDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, OntarioN2L 3G1, Canada.
Cody RecenoDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, OntarioN2L 3G1, Canada.
Brian IngallsDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, OntarioN2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2118-3881
University of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling in systems and synthetic biology relies on accurate parameter estimates and predictions. Accurate model calibration relies, in turn, on data and on how well suited the available data are to a particular modeling task. Optimal experimental design (OED) techniques can be used to identify experiments and data collection procedures that will most efficiently contribute to a given modeling objective. However, implementation of OED is limited by currently available software tools that are not well suited for the diversity of nonlinear models and non-normal data commonly encountered in biological research. Moreover, existing OED tools do not make use of the state-of-the-art numerical tools, resulting in inefficient computation. Here, we present the NLoed software package and demonstrate its use with in vivo data from an optogenetic system in

Indexed as

Research DesignSystems BiologyEscherichia coliModels, BiologicalSoftwareSynthetic Biology

Identifiers

PMID36473701
PMCPMC9765746
OpenAlexW4311700793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.