ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2023
Management of infected indwelling ureteral stents An international survey of urologists.
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere are no clinical guidelines for the manipulation of chronic indwelling ureteral stents. The goal of this study was to survey, through a simulated case, how urologists initially manage a patient with a chronic ureteral stent presenting with urosepsis.
methodsAn online questionnaire was shared from July 1 to August 31, 2021, through social media (Twitter) and email lists. The scenario described a 50-year-old female, known for a chronic indwelling ureteral stent, presenting to the emergency department with fever, tachycardia, and flank pain. In the scenario, the stent was in adequate position and the last exchange had been performed one month prior. Respondents could choose between treating with antibiotics and keeping the same exchange schedule, urgent stent exchange, or an alternative management that they defined. P<0.05 was considered significant.
resultsA total of 396 participants completed the survey. Responses from 48 countries were collected, with 135 (34.1%) respondents from Canada. Half (50%) of respondents had more than 10 years of experience. Most (79.3%) respondents opted for initial empiric antibiotic therapy, while 16.2% opted for urgent stent exchange. A total of 19 (4.9%) medical specialists completed the survey. Non-urologists opted more frequently than urologists (42.1% vs. 16.2%) for urgent stent exchange (p=0.0111).
conclusionsThis questionnaire allowed us to explore the various managements proposed by urologists in a patient with urosepsis and chronic indwelling ureteral stent. Most urologists opted for initial medical management. Further clinical studies could help determine the necessity for ureteral stent manipulation in urosepsis, and, if present, its ideal timing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.