Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36473143›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2023

Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus EXTREME Regimen as First-Line Treatment for Recurrent/Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: The Final Results of CheckMate 651.

Robert I Haddad, Kevin Harrington, Makoto Tahara, Robert L Ferris, Maura Gillison, Jerome Fayette, Amaury Daste, Piotr Koralewski, Bogdan Zurawski, Miren Taberna and 15 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02741570 (An Open Label, Randomized, Two Arm Phase III Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Versus Extreme Study Regimen), which is not on this map. Cited by 107 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02741570 phase3completednot on this map

An Open Label, Randomized, Two Arm Phase III Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab Versus Extreme Study Regimen (Cetuximab + Cisplatin/Carboplatin + Fluorouracil) as First Line Therapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2016 to 2022Enrolled947ConditionsHead and Neck CancerArmsNivolumab, Ipilimumab, Cetuximab/Erbitux, Cisplatin/Platinol, Carboplatin/Paraplatin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advancements in immunotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: Current landscape and future prospects.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy monotherapy versus combination regimens in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Exosomal MicroRNAs as novel diagnostic biomarkers in head and neck cancer: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. 4-1BBCell reports. Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  20. Trial

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.

Robert I HaddadDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-1413-0079
Kevin HarringtonRoyal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6014-348X
Makoto TaharaNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9035-3106
Robert L FerrisUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-6605-2071
Maura GillisonThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jerome FayetteCentre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Amaury DasteHôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France.
Piotr KoralewskiWojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny im. Ludwika Rydygiera w Krakowie, Krakow, Poland.
Bogdan ZurawskiAmbulatorium Chemioterapii, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Miren TabernaCatalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Nabil F SabaWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0003-4972-1477
Milena MakInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5876-6533
Andrzej KaweckiMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Gustavo GirottoHospital de Base de Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4098-1320
Miguel Angel Alvarez AvitiaInstituto Nacional De Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Caroline EvenGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Joaquin Gabriel Reinoso ToledoThe Research Unit, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Alexander GuminskiRoyal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3681-7015
Urs Müller-RichterUniversity Hospital Würzburg, Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7869-7686
Naomi KiyotaKobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8021-6116
Mustimbo RobertsBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Tariq Aziz KhanBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Karen Miller-MoslinBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Li WeiBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Athanassios ArgirisHygeia Hospital, Marousi, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-8812
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USCentre Léon Bérard · FRComprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken · DEEmory University · USHarvard University · USHôpital Saint-André · FRHospital de Base · BRInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESInstitute of Cancer Research · GBInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo · BRInstituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXKobe University Hospital · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPRoyal North Shore Hospital · AUThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThomas Jefferson University · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USWojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny we Wrocławiu · PL

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Cancer Research UK 28724NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCheckMate 651 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02741570) evaluated first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus EXTREME (cetuximab plus cisplatin/carboplatin plus fluorouracil ≤ six cycles, then cetuximab maintenance) in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).

methodsPatients without prior systemic therapy for R/M SCCHN were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab plus ipilimumab or EXTREME. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) in the all randomly assigned and programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 20 populations. Secondary end points included OS in the programmed death-ligand 1 CPS ≥ 1 population, and progression-free survival, objective response rate, and duration of response in the all randomly assigned and CPS ≥ 20 populations.

resultsAmong 947 patients randomly assigned, 38.3% had CPS ≥ 20. There were no statistically significant differences in OS with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus EXTREME in the all randomly assigned (median: 13.9

conclusionCheckMate 651 did not meet its primary end points of OS in the all randomly assigned or CPS ≥ 20 populations. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed a favorable safety profile compared with EXTREME. There continues to be a need for new therapies in patients with R/M SCCHN.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCetuximabHumansIpilimumabNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNivolumabSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCetuximabIpilimumabNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID36473143
PMCPMC10115555
OpenAlexW4311654154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.