ArticleAnalytical chemistry2022
CCS Predictor 2.0: An Open-Source Jupyter Notebook Tool for Filtering Out False Positives in Metabolomics.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Candidate Structure Prioritization in Non-Target Screening with Predicted Collision Cross-Sections and Uncertainty Quantification.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Integrating Computational Chemistry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry into Non-Targeted Analysis Workflows for the Structural Elucidation of Emerging PFAS.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
- A Novel Workflow for Fast Elucidation of Drug Metabolites for Screening-Combining In Silico Metabolite Prediction With Trapped Ion Mobility QTOF-MS.Drug testing and analysis · 2026Article
- Review
- A Spatial Metabolomics Annotation Workflow Leveraging Cyclic Ion Mobility and Machine Learning-Predicted Collision Cross Sections.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025Article
- Deep MALDI-MS spatial omics guided by quantum cascade laser mid-infrared imaging microscopy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- PubChemLite Plus Collision Cross Section (CCS) Values for Enhanced Interpretation of Nontarget Environmental Data.Environmental science & technology letters · 2025Article
- Uncertainty Quantification and Flagging of Unreliable Predictions in Predicting Mass Spectrometry-Related Properties of Small Molecules Using Machine Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Evaluating the generalizability of graph neural networks for predicting collision cross section.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- Recent Developments in Machine Learning for Mass Spectrometry.ACS measurement science au · 2024Review
- Elucidation of Dithiol-yne Comb Polymer Architectures by Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Ion Mobility Techniques.Polymers · 2024Article
- Offline Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for Deep Annotation of the Fecal Metabolome Following Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Predicting the Predicted: A Comparison of Machine Learning-Based Collision Cross-Section Prediction Models for Small Molecules.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Computational tools and algorithms for ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry.Proteomics · 2024Review
- Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry for Large Synthetic Molecules: Expanding the Analytical Toolbox.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024Review
- HILIC-IM-MS for Simultaneous Lipid and Metabolite Profiling of Bacteria.ACS measurement science au · 2024Article
- MOCCal: A Multiomic CCS Calibrator for Traveling Wave Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Application of Ion Mobility Spectrometry and the Derived Collision Cross Section in the Analysis of Environmental Organic Micropollutants.Environmental science & technology · 2023Review
- Collision cross section measurement and prediction methods in omics.Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2023Review
- MassCCS: A High-Performance Collision Cross-Section Software for Large Macromolecular Assemblies.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolite annotation continues to be the widely accepted bottleneck in nontargeted metabolomics workflows. Annotation of metabolites typically relies on a combination of high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) with parent and tandem measurements, isotope cluster evaluations, and Kendrick mass defect (KMD) analysis. Chromatographic retention time matching with standards is often used at the later stages of the process, which can also be followed by metabolite isolation and structure confirmation utilizing nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The measurement of gas-phase collision cross-section (CCS) values by ion mobility (IM) spectrometry also adds an important dimension to this workflow by generating an additional molecular parameter that can be used for filtering unlikely structures. The millisecond timescale of IM spectrometry allows the rapid measurement of CCS values and allows easy pairing with existing MS workflows. Here, we report on a highly accurate machine learning algorithm (CCSP 2.0) in an open-source Jupyter Notebook format to predict CCS values based on linear support vector regression models. This tool allows customization of the training set to the needs of the user, enabling the production of models for new adducts or previously unexplored molecular classes. CCSP produces predictions with accuracy equal to or greater than existing machine learning approaches such as CCSbase, DeepCCS, and AllCCS, while being better aligned with FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data principles. Another unique aspect of CCSP 2.0 is its inclusion of a large library of 1613 molecular descriptors via the Mordred Python package, further encoding the fine aspects of isomeric molecular structures. CCS prediction accuracy was tested using CCS values in the McLean CCS Compendium with median relative errors of 1.25, 1.73, and 1.87% for the 170 [M - H]
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.