Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36473057›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2022

CCS Predictor 2.0: An Open-Source Jupyter Notebook Tool for Filtering Out False Positives in Metabolomics.

Markace A Rainey, Chandler A Watson, Carter K Asef, Makayla R Foster, Erin S Baker, Facundo M Fernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Markace A RaineySchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, 901 Atlantic Dr. NWAtlanta, Georgia30332, United States.
Chandler A WatsonSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, 901 Atlantic Dr. NWAtlanta, Georgia30332, United States.
Carter K AsefSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, 901 Atlantic Dr. NWAtlanta, Georgia30332, United States.
Makayla R FosterDepartment of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina27695, United States.
Erin S BakerDepartment of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina27695, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5246-2213
Facundo M FernándezSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, 901 Atlantic Dr. NWAtlanta, Georgia30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0302-2534

Funding

Single cell, multi-parametric high throughput platform to classify endocrine disruptor potential of mixturesP42ES027704 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI Weihsueh A Chiu · 2017 to 2026
$21.2M
Translational Research Support CoreP30ES025128 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Sue Fenton · 2015 to 2026
$18.3M
Uncovering the Mechanisms of PFAS-induced ImmunotoxicityP42ES031009 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI HOPPIN, JANE · 2020 to 2024
$9.3M
Deep Ovarian Cancer MetabolomicsR01CA218664 · NCI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Facundo Martin Fernandez, Jaeyeon Kim · 2018 to 2026
$4.3M
Portal for Open Computational Metabolomics Tools - Yr 4 U2C SupplementU2CES030167 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI SCHROEDER, FRANK CLEMENS · 2018 to 2021
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218664NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES025128NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES027704NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES031009NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES030167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolite annotation continues to be the widely accepted bottleneck in nontargeted metabolomics workflows. Annotation of metabolites typically relies on a combination of high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) with parent and tandem measurements, isotope cluster evaluations, and Kendrick mass defect (KMD) analysis. Chromatographic retention time matching with standards is often used at the later stages of the process, which can also be followed by metabolite isolation and structure confirmation utilizing nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The measurement of gas-phase collision cross-section (CCS) values by ion mobility (IM) spectrometry also adds an important dimension to this workflow by generating an additional molecular parameter that can be used for filtering unlikely structures. The millisecond timescale of IM spectrometry allows the rapid measurement of CCS values and allows easy pairing with existing MS workflows. Here, we report on a highly accurate machine learning algorithm (CCSP 2.0) in an open-source Jupyter Notebook format to predict CCS values based on linear support vector regression models. This tool allows customization of the training set to the needs of the user, enabling the production of models for new adducts or previously unexplored molecular classes. CCSP produces predictions with accuracy equal to or greater than existing machine learning approaches such as CCSbase, DeepCCS, and AllCCS, while being better aligned with FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data principles. Another unique aspect of CCSP 2.0 is its inclusion of a large library of 1613 molecular descriptors via the Mordred Python package, further encoding the fine aspects of isomeric molecular structures. CCS prediction accuracy was tested using CCS values in the McLean CCS Compendium with median relative errors of 1.25, 1.73, and 1.87% for the 170 [M - H]

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMetabolomicsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidMachine LearningMass Spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID36473057
PMCPMC9772062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.