Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36473024›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2022

A Telerehabilitation Program for Maintaining Functional Capacity in Patients With Chronic Lung Diseases During a Period of COVID-19 Social Isolation: Quasi-Experimental Retrospective Study.

Aline Paula Miozzo, Natiele Camponogara Righi, Maria Luiza Yumi Shizukuishi, Hérica Marques Ferreira Aguilar, Juliessa Florian, Scheila da Costa Machado, Jociane Schardong, Rodrigo Della Méa Plentz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient-managed interventions for adults with bronchiectasis: evidence, challenges and prospects.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aline Paula Miozzo *Physiotherapy Department, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6529-4060
Natiele Camponogara Righi *Physiotherapy Department, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7621-7204
Maria Luiza Yumi Shizukuishi *Physiotherapy Department, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-2110
Hérica Marques Ferreira Aguilar *Physiotherapy Department, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-7052
Juliessa Florian *Physiotherapy Department, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9644-8875
Scheila da Costa Machado *Physiotherapy Department, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1407-900X
Jociane Schardong *Physiotherapy Department, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-8541
Rodrigo Della Méa Plentz *Physiotherapy Department, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2662-8192
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary diseases represent a great cause of disability and mortality in the world, and given the progression of these pathologies, pulmonary rehabilitation programs have proven to be effective for people with chronic respiratory diseases. During the COVID-19 pandemic, telerehabilitation has become an alternative for patients with such diseases.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the outcomes (ie, functional capacity and quality of life) of telerehabilitation to those of usual care among patients who previously participated in face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation programs.

methodsWe conducted a quasi-experimental retrospective study from April 2020 to August 2021. A total of 32 patients with chronic lung diseases were included and divided into the control and intervention groups. The intervention group performed telerehabilitation synchronously twice per week and was supervised by a physical therapist during breathing, strengthening, and aerobic exercises. Changes in the degree of dyspnea and leg discomfort were assessed based on changes in Borg scale scores. The control group did not perform any activities during the period of social isolation. Functional capacity was assessed with the 6-minute walk test, and quality of life was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey.

resultsThe telerehabilitation group's mean 6-minute walk distance decreased by 39 m, while that of the control group decreased by 120 m. There was a difference of 81 m between the groups' mean 6-minute walk distances (P=.02). In relation to the quality of life, telerehabilitation was shown to improve the following two domains: social functioning and mental health.

conclusionsTelerehabilitation programs for patients with chronic lung diseases can ease the deleterious effects of disease progression, be used to maintain functional capacity, and improve aspects of quality of life.

Indexed as

chronic diseaseCOVID-19lung diseasesmental healthpatient outcomepulmonarypulmonary rehabilitationquality of liferehabilitationsocial functioningsocial isolationtelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36473024
PMCPMC9795598
OpenAlexW4310781877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.