ArticlePloS one2022
Transcriptome analysis and development of EST-SSR markers in Anoectochilus emeiensis (Orchidaceae).
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of the complete multi-chromosomal mitogenome of Anoectochilus emeiensis (Orchidaceae).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Transcriptome-Wide Identification and Development of SSR Markers for Genetic Diversity Studies in MedicinalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Development of SSR markers related to salinity resistance based on transcriptomic sequences in Medicago sativa.PloS one · 2025Article
- De Novo Transcriptome Assembly ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Transcriptome analysis and development of EST-SSR markers in the mushroom Auricularia heimuer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anoectochilus emeiensis K. Y. Lang, together with other Anoectochilus species, has long been used as the main source of many traditional Chinese medicines. Owing to the shortcomings of molecular markers, the study of the genetic diversity and medicinal component synthesis mechanism of the endemic Anoectochilus species has been delayed. In this study, I carried out a transcriptome analysis of A. emeiensis. A total of 78,381 unigenes were assembled from 64.2 million reads, and 47,541 (60.65%) unigenes were matched to known proteins in the public databases. Then, 9284 expressed sequence tag-derived simple sequence repeats (EST-SSRs) were identified, and the frequency of SSRs in the A. emeiensis transcriptome was 9.88%. Trinucleotide repeats (3699, 39.84%) were the most common type, followed by dinucleotide (3251, 35.02%) and mononucleotide (1750, 18.85%) repeats. Based on the SSR sequence, 6683 primer pairs were successfully designed, 40 primer pairs were randomly selected, and 10 primer pairs were identified as polymorphic loci from 186 individuals of A. emeiensis. The EST-SSR markers examined in this study will be informative for future population genetic studies of A. emeiensis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.