Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36472880›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

What Is the Best Candidate to Replace the Tarsus? A Biomechanical, Histological, and Optical Study Comparing Five Grafts.

Ken Martini, Sebastien Schaub, Corine Bertoloto, Stephanie Baillif, Sandra Lassalle, Paul Martel, Arnaud Martel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ken MartiniOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
Sebastien SchaubSorbonne University, CNRS, Developmental Biology Laboratory (LBDV), Villefranche-sur-Mer Cedex, France.
Corine BertolotoMediterranean Center of Molecular Medicine, Nice, France.
Stephanie BaillifOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
Sandra LassalleLaboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Côte d'Azur University, FHU OncoAge, Pasteur Hospital, Nice, France.
Paul MartelSterlab Laboratory, Vallauris, France.
Arnaud MartelOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRCentre Méditerranéen de Médecine Moléculaire · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Pasteur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Reconstruction of the posterior lamella after eyelid tumor removal is challenging and not consensual. Tarsus is the most suitable graft, but is only available in small amounts. Herein, we aim to determine the most appropriate way to replace the tarsus by comparing the biomechanical, histological, and optical properties of five commonly used grafts. Methods: This study was conducted at the University hospital of Nice between June 2019 and June 2020. Five posterior lamella grafts (tarsus, conchal cartilage, sclera, hard palate, and dermis) were harvested in five fresh frozen cadavers. Biomechanical properties were assessed by tractometry. Collagen and elastin fibers were analyzed by using histological analysis and optical characterization with the second harmonic generation imaging. Results: The mean Young's modulus was 8.92 MPa (range, 2.90-22.90 MPa), 1.05 MPa (range, 0.39-1.76 MPa), 8.72 MPa (range, 2.0-23.50 MPa), 2.57 MPa (range, 0.41-4.35 MPa), and 1.44 MPa (range, 0.71-2.30 MPa) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. The mean tensile strength was 3 MPa (range, 1.70-6.88 MPa), 0.54 MPa (range, 0.13-0.79 MPa), 2.87 MPa (range, 1.23-5.40 MPa), 1.4 MPa (range, 0.21-2.40 MPa) and 1.0 MPa (range, 0.46-1.43 MPa) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. Hard palate mucosa was the closest to the tarsus regarding the ratio of elastin and collagen fibers. The average second harmonic generation intensity was 221 arbitrary units (a.u.) (range, 165-362 a.u.), 182 a.u. (range, 35-259 a.u.), 369 a.u. (range, 206-533 a.u.), 108 a.u. (range, 34-208 a.u.), and 244 a.u. (range, 195-388 a.u.) for the tarsus, the conchal cartilage, the sclera, the hard palate mucosa, and the dermis, respectively. The hard palate mucosa and the dermis were the closest to the tarsus regarding the collagen fiber size and orientation, respectively. Conclusions: By attributing 2 points for each characteristic (biomechanical, histological, and optical), the hard palate mucosa and the sclera seem to be the most suitable grafts to replace the tarsus. Translational Relevance: The aim of this article was to assess the biomechanical, histological and optical characteristics of five of the most commonly used tarsal grafts; this may be helpful in decisions for clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID36472880
PMCPMC9733651
OpenAlexW4311575752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.