ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022
Effect of Dioptric Blur on Pattern-Reversal and Motion-Onset VEPs as Used in Clinical Research.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiological determinants of cortical P100 responses in pattern visual evoked potentials: a scoping review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Dioptric blur is not fully reflected by VEP-based visual acuity estimates.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Nystagmus characteristics and their impact on pattern-reversal VEP in patients with albinism.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Motion onset VEPs can see through the blur.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the effect of dioptric blur on visual evoked potentials (VEPs) induced by motion onset (MO-VEPs). Methods: The effect of dioptric blur up to 4 D on MO-VEPs was tested on 12 subjects using central, peripheral, and full-field stimulation with a low-contrast structure of concentric circles with spatial frequency <1 c/°. The results were compared to VEPs evoked by 15' and 60' checkerboard pattern-reversal (PR-VEPs). The relationship between peak time and interpeak amplitude of the dominant components was related to the level of dioptric blur using linear regression. Results: The MO-VEPs did not show a significant peak prolongation (P > 0.28) or amplitude attenuation (P > 0.14) with the blur, whereas for the PR-VEPs we observed a significant decrease in amplitude (P < 0.001) and increase in peak time (P < 0.001) for both checkerboard sizes. Conclusions: For MO-VEPs induced by radial motion of low contrast and low spatial frequency pattern, the change in retinal blur does not affect the peak time or the interpeak amplitude of the dominant N2 component. Translational Relevance: The resistance to retinal blur that we demonstrated for MO-VEP provides a diagnostic opportunity to test the integrity of the visual system and reveal a retrobulbar impairment even in uncorrected refractive errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.