ArticleJAMA network open2022
Association of Outpatient Behavioral Health Treatment With Medical and Pharmacy Costs in the First 27 Months Following a New Behavioral Health Diagnosis in the US.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence and Online Psychotherapy Initiative to Improve Access and Efficiency in an Ambulatory Psychiatric Setting: Évaluation d'une initiative de psychothérapie en ligne basée sur l'intelligence artificielle visant à améliorer l'accès et l'efficacité en milieu psychiatrique ambulatoire.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2026Article
- Depression and Anxiety Outcomes in a Technology-Enabled Psychotherapy Practice: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Using large language models as a scalable mental status evaluation technique.NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Return on Investment of Enhanced Behavioral Health Services.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The Impact of Enhanced Behavioral Health Services on Total Healthcare Costs Among US Employers: A Site-Level Analysis of 19 Cohort Studies.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2025Article
- Disparities and Medical Expenditure Implications in Pediatric Tele-Mental Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mississippi.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2025Article
- Tele-Mental Health Service: Unveiling the Disparity and Impact on Healthcare Access and Expenditures during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mississippi.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Outpatient behavioral health treatment (OPBHT) is an effective treatment for behavioral health conditions (BHCs) that may also be associated with improved medical health outcomes, but evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of OPBHT across a large population has not been established. Objective: To investigate whether individuals newly diagnosed with a BHC who used OPBHT incurred lower medical and pharmacy costs over 15 and 27 months of follow-up compared with those not using OPBHT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study of commercially insured individuals in the US was conducted using administrative insurance claims data for individuals newly diagnosed with 1 or more BHCs between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018. Data were examined using a 12-month period before BHC diagnosis and 15- and 27-month follow-up periods. Participants included individuals aged 1 to 64 years who received any OPBHT with or without behavioral medication or who did not receive OPBHT or behavioral medication in the 15 months following diagnosis. Data were analyzed from May to October 2021. Exposures: Receipt of OPBHT both as a dichotomous variable and categorized by number of OPBHT visits. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the association between OPBHT treatment and 15- and 27-month medical and pharmacy costs, assessed using a generalized linear regression model with γ distribution, controlling for potential confounders. Results: The study population included 203 401 individuals, of whom most were male (52%), White, non-Hispanic (75%), and 18 to 64 years of age (67%); 22% had at least 1 chronic medical condition in addition to a BHC. Having 1 or more OPBHT visits was associated with lower adjusted mean per-member, per-month medical and pharmacy costs across follow-up over 15 months (no OPBHT: $686 [95% CI, $619-$760]; ≥1 OPBHT: $571 [95% CI, $515-$632]; P < .001) and 27 months (no OPBHT: $464 [95% CI, $393-$549]; ≥1 OPBHT: $391 [95% CI, $331-$462]; P < .001). Furthermore, almost all doses of OPBHT across the 15 months following diagnosis were associated with lower costs compared with no OPBHT. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, medical cost savings were associated with OPBHT among patients newly diagnosed with a BHC in a large, commercially insured population. The findings suggest that promoting and optimizing OPBHT may be associated with reduced overall medical spending among patients with BHCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.