ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023
Can magnetic resonance imaging after cranioplasty using titanium mesh detect brain tumors?
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study determined the dependence of the concentration and position of contrast-enhanced tumors on the radio frequency (RF)-shielding effect of titanium mesh using the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A phantom was constructed by filling a plastic container with manganese chloride tetrahydrate and agar. Four cellophane cylindrical containers were arranged from the end of the plastic container, and the brain tumor model was filled with gadobutrol diluted with NaCl, with molarity values of 0.2-1.0 mmol/L. The titanium mesh board was set on the left side of the phantom. Images were acquired using a 1.5-T MRI as well as two-dimensional spin-echo (2D SE) and three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient echo (3D FSPGR) sequences. CNR was calculated using the signal intensity values of the tumor model, surrounding area of the brain model, and background noise. Furthermore, the fractional change in CNR was calculated using values of CNR with and without the mesh. Moreover, a profile of CNR was created. The fractional change in CNR decreased at the brain tumor positions present near the mesh and at a contrast medium concentration of approximately ≤ 0.5 mmol/L in 2D SE and ≤ 0.25 mmol/L in 3D FSPGR. According to the CNR profiles, directly under the mesh, almost all contrast concentrations in 2D SE was unrecognizable; however, at a concentration of ≥ 0.5 mmol/L in 3D FSPGR was recognizable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.