Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36472698›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Value of CEUS combined with feeding artery ablation in the microwave ablation of large solid benign thyroid nodules.

Hequn Li, Qimeihui Wang, Guoqing Sui, Yuanqiang Lin, Qiang Luo, Peng Dong, Lingyu Zhu, Hui Wang, Dengke Teng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hequn LiDepartment of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5210-0677
Qimeihui WangDepartment of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, China.
Guoqing SuiDepartment of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, China.
Yuanqiang LinDepartment of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, China.
Qiang LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, China.
Peng DongDepartment of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, China.
Lingyu ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, China.
Hui WangDepartment of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1608-3782
Dengke TengDepartment of Ultrasound, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130033, China. tengdk@jlu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4266-8941
Union Hospital · CN

Funding

Jilin Department of Health 2019SCZ027Jilin Department of Health 2020SCZ08Jilin Scientific and Technological Development Program 20190303140SF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with feeding artery ablation in the microwave ablation (MWA) of large solid benign thyroid nodules (LSBTNs) with a diameter ≥ 4 cm.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 122 patients with LSBTN ≥ 4 cm in diameter treated with MWA. During evaluations before and after MWA, 53 patients who underwent conventional ultrasound examination were classified as the routine group, and 69 patients who underwent CEUS combined with feeding artery ablation were classified as the union group. The differences in ablation energy required per milliliter (AERPM), complication rate, regrowth rate, and volume reduction rate (VRR) were compared between the two groups.

resultsThe AERPM of the union group was significantly less than that of the routine group (956.3 ± 38.5 J/mL vs. 1025.9 ± 121.5 J/mL, p < 0.001). The complication rate of the routine group was significantly higher than that of the union group (13.2% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.031). The regrowth rate of the routine group (22.6%, 12/53) was significantly higher than that of the union group (7.2%, 5/69) (p = 0.015). At the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 18th, and 24th month after ablation, the mean VRRs of the routine group were significantly less than those of the union group, with p values of < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.002, 0.007, 0.013, and < 0.001, respectively.

conclusionsThe application of CEUS combined with feeding artery ablation in the MWA of LSBTNs is helpful to reduce the regrowth rate, improve the ablation efficiency, and reduce bleeding. KEY POINTS: • CEUS combined with feeding artery ablation in MWA of LSBTNs is helpful to reduce regrowth rate. • CEUS combined with feeding artery ablation can help improve ablation efficiency than conventional ultrasound in LSBTNs. • CEUS combined with feeding artery ablation helps reduce the incidence of bleeding during MWA.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationThyroid NoduleArteriesHumansMicrowavesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeContrast mediaMicrowavesThyroid noduleUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36472698
OpenAlexW4310772688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.