Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36472672›Full record

ArticleBiomedical microdevices2022

Silicon membranes for extracorporeal life support: a comparison of design and fabrication methodologies.

David G Blauvelt, Benjamin W Chui, Nicholas C Higgins, Francisco J Baltazar, Shuvo Roy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical microdevices, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David G BlauveltDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Benjamin W ChuiDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nicholas C HigginsDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Francisco J BaltazarDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Shuvo RoyDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Shuvo.Roy@ucsf.edu.

Funding

West Coast Consortium for Technology and Innovation in PediatricsP50FD006425 · FDA · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI BAR-COHEN, YANIV, ESPINOZA, JUAN · 2018 to 2022
$7.0M
Training in Developmental Cardiovascular BiologyT32HL007544 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SRIVASTAVA, DEEPAK · 1985 to 2021
$4.5M
Implantable Bio-Artificial Pancreas (iBAP)U01EB025136 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROY, SHUVO · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Research Training in Pediatric Critical Care MedicineT32HD049303 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JEFFREY R FINEMAN · 2006 to 2026
$3.1M
FDA HHS P50 FD006425NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007544NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB025136NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD049303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracorporeal life support is an advanced therapy that circulates blood through an extracorporeal oxygenator, performing gas exchange outside the body. However, its use is limited by severe complications, including bleeding, clotting, and hemolysis. Semiconductor silicon-based membranes have emerged as an alternative to traditional hollow-fiber semipermeable membranes. These membranes offer excellent gas exchange efficiency and the potential to increase hemocompatibility by improving flow dynamics. In this work, we evaluate two next-generation silicon membrane designs, which are intended to be mechanically robust and efficient in gas exchange, while simultaneously reducing fabrication complexity. The "window" design features 10 µm pores on one side and large windows on the back side. The "cavern" design also uses 10 µm pores but contains a network of interconnected buried caverns to distribute the sweep gas from smaller inlet holes. Both designs were shown to be technically viable and able to be reproducibly fabricated. In addition, they both were mechanically robust and withstood 30 psi of transmembrane pressure without breakage or bubbling. At low sweep gas pressures, gas transfer efficiency was similar, with the partial pressure of oxygen in water increasing by 10.7 ± 2.3 mmHg (mean ± standard deviation) and 13.6 ± 1.9 mmHg for the window and cavern membranes, respectively. Gas transfer efficiency was also similar at higher pressures. At 10 psi, oxygen tension increased by 16.8 ± 5.7 mmHg (window) and 18.9 ± 1.3 mmHg (cavern). We conclude that silicon membranes featuring a 10 µm pore size can simplify the fabrication process and improve mechanical robustness while maintaining excellent efficiency.

Indexed as

SiliconSiliconArtificial lungECMOExtracorporeal life supportMicro-electromechanical systemsMicrofluidicsOxygenator

Identifiers

PMID36472672
PMCPMC12930469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.