Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36472633›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Effect of anterior maxillary wall shape on ease of prelacrimal recess approach among Asians and Westerners.

Hyung-Bon Koo, Jae-Hoon Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Prelacrimal Recess Approach: A Review of Surgical Applications, Outcomes, and Recent Advances.Journal of rhinology : official journal of the Korean Rhinologic Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyung-Bon KooDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Wonkang Medical Science, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea.
Jae-Hoon LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Institute of Wonkang Medical Science, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea. Leejaehoon64@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0856-8173
Wonkwang University · KRWonkwang University Hospital · KR

Funding

Wonkwang University 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndoscopic sinus surgery has been widely used in the treatment of most maxillary diseases, although the inability to access lesions in the anterior and inferior maxillary sinus walls is a major disadvantage. In few cases, the prelacrimal recess (PLR) approach can be used, which secures an overall view within the maxillary sinus. The distance between the anterior maxillary wall and lacrimal duct is related to the ease of the PLR approach. First we measured the distance between the anterior maxillary wall and lacrimal duct using anatomical image analysis to classify the types and then evaluated whether anatomical factors were related to the results.

methodsBoth sides of the sinuses were evaluated in 272 participants (544 sides). After marking a tangent line (line 1 [L1]) through the posterior surface of the anterior maxillary sinus wall and a parallel line (line 2 [L2]) to the anterior surface of the lacrimal duct, the vertical distance between L1 and L2 was measured. Vertical distances of < 3 mm, 3-7 mm, and > 7 mm were classified as PLR approach types I, II, and III, respectively. In the axial plane image, line 3 (L3) (a horizontal line starting from the inner anterior maxillary sinus wall) was drawn and the angle with L1 (L1-L3A) was measured.

resultsThe proportions of types I, II, and III were 23.2% (126), 55.0% (299), and 21.8% (119), respectively. The mean L1-L3As for types I, II, and III were 12.87 ± 4.92°, 11.20 ± 5.08°, and 10.40 ± 4.47°, respectively, showing a significant difference in mean values (p < 0.001). The L1-L3A and vertical distance between L1 and L2 showed a significant negative correlation (r = - 0.201, p < 0.001).

conclusionsWe observed a correlation between the distance from the anterior maxillary wall to the lacrimal duct and L1-L3A. The L1-L3A indicates the degree of curvature of the anterior maxillary wall; therefore, the smaller the L1-L3A, the easier it may be to access the PLR.

Indexed as

AsianLacrimal ApparatusEndoscopyHumansMaxillaMaxillary SinusComputed tomographyEndoscopic sinus surgeryLacrimal ductMaxillary sinusPrelacrimal recessRadioanatomical study

Identifiers

PMID36472633
OpenAlexW4310776306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.