ArticleSkeletal radiology2023
Evaluation of the relationship between abdominal fat distribution and osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with MRI.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study was carried out to investigate the effects of abdominal subcutaneous adiposity and visceral adiposity on osteoporotic compression fractures. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe study group consisted of a total of 152 individuals aged 50-80 years; 76 were included in the vertebral fracture group and 76 in the healthy control group, whose bone mineral density was calculated. In order to determine the distribution of abdominal fat in both groups, four different measurements, i.e., sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD), abdominal diameter (AD), ventral subcutaneous thickness (VST), and dorsal subcutaneous thickness (DST), were made using lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The visceral fat ratio (VFR) was also calculated based on these measurements.
resultsThere was a significant difference between the patient and control groups in VST and DST values, both when gender distribution was and was not taken into account (p < 0.006 for all cases). There was no significant difference between the patient and control groups in SAD and AS values, both when only female patients were considered, and gender distribution was not taken into account (p > 0.25 for all cases). On the other hand, in the analysis, when only male patients were considered, the SAD and AD values of the patient group were found to be significantly lower than those of the control group (p = 0.046 and p = 0.048, respectively).
conclusionIn conclusion, the study findings indicated that high SAD values in the male gender and high VST and DST values in both genders were associated with low lumbar vertebral fracture risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36472632What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.