ArticleMaterials today. Bio2023
GTKO rabbit: A novel animal model for preclinical assessment of decellularized xenogeneic grafts via in situ implantation.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wild type (WT) animals cannot be used to objectively assess the immunogenicity of animal tissue-derived biomaterials when used as recipients due to difference with human in α-Gal expression. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences of immunological responses between the GGTA1 gene-knockout (GTKO) rabbits and WT rabbits after implantation with animal tissue-derived biomaterials. The porcine-derived decellularized bone matrix (natural bone material, NBM) and fresh porcine cancellous bone (PCB) were implanted in GTKO rabbits and WT rabbits, respectively, and sham operation was used as control (Con). At 2- and 6-week post-implantation, the related immunological items including antibody levels, serum-mediated cell lysis, cytokines, lymphocyte subtypes, and histopathological changes were assessed. GTKO rabbits exhibited more sensitive immune responses than WT rabbits after PCB implantation, resulted from a significant increase of antibodies (except total antibodies) and cytokines levels, cell lysis ratios, CD4/CD8 proportions, and inflammatory cells infiltration. Immunological factors and inflammatory cells infiltrate in GTKO rabbits after NBM implantation were significantly lower than those in the PCB group. Among the three groups, the NBM group showed the highest contents of new bone formation elements. In conclusion, the GTKO rabbit is a more sensitive alternative model than WT rabbit for preclinical study of xenografts via in situ implantation. Studies on multiple gene-edited animals are also necessary for more comprehensively evaluating xenoimmunologen risks of animal tissue-derived biomaterials in the future. Additionally, the immunogenicity of NBM was remarkably decreased compared to PCB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.