Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36471873›Full record

ReviewiScience2023

Rafael Borges Rosa, Emilene Ferreira de Castro, Murilo Vieira da Silva, Denise Caroline Paiva Ferreira, Ana Carolina Gomes Jardim, Igor Andrade Santos, Mikaela Dos Santos Marinho, Flávia Batista Ferreira França, Lindomar José Pena

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rafael Borges RosaDepartment of Virology and Experimental Therapy (LAVITE), Aggeu Magalhães Institute (IAM), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Recife 50740-465, Brazil.
Emilene Ferreira de CastroRodents Animal Facilities Complex, Federal University of Uberlândia (REBIR-UFU), Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil.
Murilo Vieira da SilvaRodents Animal Facilities Complex, Federal University of Uberlândia (REBIR-UFU), Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil.
Denise Caroline Paiva FerreiraRodents Animal Facilities Complex, Federal University of Uberlândia (REBIR-UFU), Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Gomes JardimInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38405-302, Brazil.
Igor Andrade SantosInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38405-302, Brazil.
Mikaela Dos Santos MarinhoInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38405-302, Brazil.
Flávia Batista Ferreira FrançaInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38405-318, Brazil.
Lindomar José PenaDepartment of Virology and Experimental Therapy (LAVITE), Aggeu Magalhães Institute (IAM), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), Recife 50740-465, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence and rapid spread outside of monkeypox virus (MPXV) to non-endemic areas has led to another global health emergency in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. The scientific community has sought to rapidly develop

Indexed as

Virology

Identifiers

PMID36471873
PMCPMC9712139
OpenAlexW4310787385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.