ArticleHeliyon2022
Sputum deposition classification for mechanically ventilated patients using LSTM method based on airflow signals.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel sputum deposition classification method for mechanically ventilated patients based on the long-short-term memory network (LSTM) method was proposed in this study. A wireless ventilation airflow signals collection system was designed and used in this study. The ventilation airflow signals were collected wirelessly and used for sputum deposition classification. Two hundred sixty data groups from 15 patients in the intensive care unit were compiled and analyzed. A two-layer LSTM framework and 11 features extracted from the airflow signals were used for the model training. The cross-validations were adopted to test the classification performance. The sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, F1 score, and G score were calculated. The proposed method has an accuracy of 84.7 ± 4.1% for sputum and non-sputum deposition classification. Moreover, compared with other classifiers (logistic regression, random forest, naive Bayes, support vector machine, and K-nearest neighbor), the proposed LSTM method is superior. In addition, the other advantages of using ventilation airflow signals for classification are its convenience and low complexity. Intelligent devices such as phones, laptops, or ventilators can be used for data processing and reminding medical staff to perform sputum suction. The proposed method could significantly reduce the workload of medical staff and increase the automation and efficiency of medical care, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.