ReviewJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2022
Systemic Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Patient Selection and Key Considerations.
Review in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chinese medicine monomers for hepatocellular carcinoma: New ideas related to autophagy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Cost Effectiveness of Tremelimumab Plus Durvalumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the USA.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Article
- Effect of regorafenib combined with immunotherapy and arterial chemoembolization on the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- A natural PCID2-Targeting compound suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression: evidence from structure-based discovery and biological evaluation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Sorafenib and Piperine co-loaded PLGA nanoparticles: Development, characterization, and anti-cancer activity against hepatocellular carcinoma cell line.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024Article
- [Status Quo and Development of Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Most patients with HCC have advanced disease at initial diagnosis, and sorafenib has been the only systemic treatment option for more than a decade in patients with advanced, unresectable HCC. However, there has been a dramatic change in the treatment algorithm in the last several years, given new drug approvals in the field. Most importantly, the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has demonstrated clinically meaningful benefits in terms of response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared to sorafenib in the first-line setting. Recently a phase III trial showed that the combination of durvalumab with a single dose of tremelimumab improved overall survival compared to sorafenib, while durvalumab monotherapy was found to be noninferior to sorafenib, making it an attractive alternative single agent in selected patient populations. As immunotherapy makes its way into the therapeutic landscape of HCC, other novel targeted therapies, such as lenvatinib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab, and regorafenib, have also been approved by regulatory authorities for treatment of advanced, unresectable HCC. This review article focuses on the first-line systemic treatment options for HCC while addressing some of the most important questions aimed at optimization of HCC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.