ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2022
Stargardt Disease Due to an Intronic Mutation in the
Article in International medical case reports journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report on a patient with Stargardt disease (STGD1) and with an intronic mutation in the Patients and Methods: A 69-year-old female patient presented to the clinic complaining of progressive vision loss. The ophthalmic evaluation was remarkable for a best corrected visual acuity of counting fingers at 5' in the right eye and 3' in the left eye. Imaging revealed deep extensive atrophy of the central macula, epithelial pigment hyperplasia, and other areas of multifocal atrophy in the right eye. Furthermore, fundus autofluorescence imaging of the macula showed central hypoautofluorescence with bilateral expansion to the periphery in both eyes. A full-field electroretinogram showed a normal rod response, with decreased cone response, bilaterally. Genetic testing was positive for a homozygous intronic mutation in the Conclusions and Importance: Patients with STGD1 due to presumed mild or moderate mutations in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.