ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2022
Utility of genetic testing in pediatric epilepsy: Experience from a low to middle-income country.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Familial SCN1A-Related Epilepsy in Palestinian Siblings: Challenges of Genetic Testing in Resource-Limited Settings: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- ADK deficiency without hypermethioninemia presenting as intractable epilepsy: a rare neurometabolic case and literature review.Neurogenetics · 2026Review
- Utility of next generation sequencing in paediatric neurological disorders: experience from South Africa.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Genetic and phenotypic landscape of pediatric-onset epilepsy in 142 Indian families: Counseling and therapeutic implications.Clinical genetics · 2024Article
- A computational clinical decision-supporting system to suggest effective anti-epileptic drugs for pediatric epilepsy patients based on deep learning models using patient's medical history.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monogenic epilepsies are a significant etiology of pediatric epilepsy. These are now more easily identified due to advances in genetic testing. However, the utility of genetic testing in low to middle-income countries (LMICs) has not been fully explored. A retrospective review was carried out in Karachi, Pakistan. Patients with symptoms suggestive of genetic epilepsy underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS). Seventy-seven patients were tested, of which 27 % (n = 21) initially had pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) results. This increased to 32 % (n = 25) after clinical reclassification of some variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Initially, 6 % of patients (n = 5) had no P/LP or VUS, and 66 % (n = 51) had at least one VUS. After variant resolution and reclassification, results were negative for 25% (n = 19) and 43% (n = 33) had VUSs. Genetic testing was positive in one-third of our population. The proportion of P/LP variants found in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.