Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36471697›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2023

Intraoperative and early postoperative complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A current concepts review.

David Hawkes, Steven Brookes-Fazakerley, Simon Robinson, Vijay Bhalaik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Clinical study of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus open reduction and internal plate fixation for treatment of Neer three/four-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Upper limb arthroplasty - An update.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David HawkesUpper Limb Unit, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Arrowe Park Rd, Upton, Birkenhead, Wirral, CH49 5PE, UK.
Steven Brookes-FazakerleyUpper Limb Unit, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Arrowe Park Rd, Upton, Birkenhead, Wirral, CH49 5PE, UK.
Simon RobinsonUpper Limb Unit, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Arrowe Park Rd, Upton, Birkenhead, Wirral, CH49 5PE, UK.
Vijay BhalaikUpper Limb Unit, Wirral University Teaching Hospital, Arrowe Park Rd, Upton, Birkenhead, Wirral, CH49 5PE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a common procedure performed for a variety of shoulder pathologies. Aims and objectives: This current concept review evaluates the intraoperative and early postoperative complications, with a specific focus given to neurological and vascular injury, fracture, dislocation and venous thromboembolism. Conclusion: A detailed knowledge of potential complications will allow surgeons to mitigate risk and maximise outcomes.

Indexed as

ComplicationsNerve injureReverse shoulder replacementShoulder arthroplastyVascular injury

Identifiers

PMID36471697
PMCPMC9718996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.