Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36471665›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

The Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound S-Detect Technology for Thyroid Nodules.

Peizhen Huang, Bin Zheng, Mengyi Li, Lin Xu, Sajjad Rabbani, Abdulilah Mohammad Mayet, Chengchun Chen, Beishu Zhan, He Jun

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Peizhen HuangDepartment of Ultrasound and Imaging, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Bin ZhengWenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Mengyi LiWenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Lin XuWenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.
Sajjad RabbaniDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Lahore College for Women University, LCWU, Lahore, Pakistan.
Abdulilah Mohammad MayetElectrical Engineering Dept, King Khalid University, Abha 61411, Saudi Arabia.
Chengchun ChenWenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-9536
Beishu ZhanDepartment of Ultrasound and Imaging, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou 325000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0965-0336
He JunDepartment of Ultrasound and Imaging, Wenzhou Central Hospital, Wenzhou 325000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6663-3092
Wenzhou Medical University · CNWenzhou Central Hospital · CNKing Khalid University · SALahore College for Women University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the consistency of ultrasound TI-RADS classification used by sonographers with different ultrasound diagnosis experience in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules and the diagnostic value of using artificial intelligence ultrasound S-Detect technology in the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid lesions. 100 patients who underwent ultrasound examination of thyroid masses in our hospital from June 2019 to June 2021 and were further punctured or operated on were included in the study. Pathological results were used as the gold standard to evaluate ultrasound S-Detect technology and the value of TI-RADS classification and the combined application of the two in diagnosing benign and malignant thyroid TI-RADS 4 types of nodules, and the consistency of judgments of doctors of different ages is assessed by a Kappa value. There were 128 nodules in 100 patients, 51 benign nodules, and 77 malignant nodules. For senior physicians, the sensitivity of diagnosis using TI-RADS classification combined with ultrasound S-Detect technology is 93.5%, specificity is 94.1%, and accuracy is 93.8%; for middle-aged physicians using TI-RADS classification combined with ultrasound S-Detect technology for diagnosis, the sensitivity is 89.6%, specificity is 92.2%, and accuracy is 90.6%; for junior doctors, the sensitivity of diagnosis using TI-RADS classification combined with ultrasound S-Detect technology is 83.1%, specificity is 88.2%, and accuracy is 85.1%. Regardless of seniority, the combined application of artificial intelligence ultrasound S-Detect technology and TI-RADS classification can improve the diagnostic ability of sonographers for thyroid nodules and at the same time improve the consistency of judgment among physicians, and this is especially important for radiologists.

Indexed as

Thyroid NoduleArtificial IntelligenceHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTechnologyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36471665
PMCPMC9719421
OpenAlexW4310295558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.