ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2023
Skin Cancer Screening and Medical Treatment Intensity in Patients with Malignant Melanoma and Non-Melanocytic Skin Cancer.
Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Defensive medicine in dermatological practice - Dermatopathology as a mirror of structural challenges.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Cemiplimab for the Management of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Drug Safety Evaluation.Cancers · 2024Review
- Cancer-Preventive Activity ofCancers · 2023Article
- Positive Effect on Prognostic Factors.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023Article
- In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis cohort study concerns the effect of skin cancer screening (SCS) on medical treatment intensity in patients with skin cancer.
methodsRoutine data from persons aged 35 to 99 who were insured by the AOK health insurance company were used to identify persons who received a diagnosis of malignant melanoma or a non-melanocytic skin cancer in 2014 or 2015, either through skin cancer screening or without screening. These persons were included in cohort studies. The routine data contained no information on tumor stages or grading. Tumor-associated rates of hospital admission, contact with physicians in outpatient practice, and intensity of surgical treatment were determined; rate ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated.
resultsThe cohort studies included 13 633 patients with melanoma (6480 with SCS and 7153 without) and 118 168 patients with non-melanocytic skin cancer (43 308 with screening and 74 860 without). Patients whose melanomas had been detected by screening had a lower medical treatment intensity than unscreened patients (intensity of tumor-associated surgical treatment (RR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.74; 0.85]), hospital contact rate (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: [0.38; 0.50]), contact with physicians in outpatient practice (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: [0.73; 0.85]). Among patients with non-melanocytic skin cancer, the screened patients displayed a lower hospital contact rate (RR = 0.52, 95% CI: [0.49; 0.56]), a higher contact rate in the outpatient sector (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: [1.08; 1.13]), and no difference in surgical treatment intensity (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: [0.96; 1.00]).
conclusionSCS is associated with lower medical treatment intensity in the first 12 months after diagnosis in patients with melanoma. Among patients with non-melanocytic skin cancer, those who had been screened had lower hospital contact rates, but there was no observed lowering of other rates reflecting treatment intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.