Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36471626›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2023

How to account for Inuit ancestry in lung function prediction.

Birgitte H Laustsen, Jakob H Bønløkke, Martin R Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Measurements in circumpolar populations: applying a questioning mind.International journal of circumpolar health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Birgitte H LaustsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jakob H BønløkkeDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Danish Ramazzini Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Martin R MillerInstitute of Applied Birmingham Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9971-5759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rigorous lung function prediction equations for the Inuit are lacking. We used spirometry from 351 Inuit and 29 people of other ancestry obtained during an occupational survey in Greenland to determine how to obtain valid lung function predictions for the Inuit using Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) equations for Europeans. Standing height for the Inuit was used in the predictions as well as their height modified in line with the known differences in standing to sitting height ratio (SHR) for the Inuit. With recorded height in predicting lung function, mean±SD Inuit z-scores for FVC and FEV1 were significantly higher than predicted (0.81±1.20 and 0.53±1.36, respectively, p<0.0001) which was not true for the non-Inuit participants (-0.01±1.04 and 0.15±1.17, respectively). When using height modified for SHR the mean±SD Inuit z-scores for FVC and FEV1 were no longer significantly different from predicted (0.10±1.10 and -0.12±1.24, respectively). The mean±SD Inuit FEV1/FVC z-scores were not significantly different from the non-Inuit, being respectively -0.45±0.98 and -0.01±1.04. Modified height changed the mean±SD Inuit FEV1/FVC z-scores to -0.39±0.99. Representative lung function predictions from GLI equations can be made for Inuit by using standing height modified for the known differences in SHR between Inuit and those of European ancestry.

Indexed as

LungForced Expiratory VolumeHumansReference ValuesRespiratory Function TestsSpirometryethnicityInuitList ancestrylung functionlung function prediction equationslung function reference valuesRace

Identifiers

PMID36471626
PMCPMC9731580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.