Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36471351›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Knowledge of cervical cancer prevention and treatment, and willingness to receive HPV vaccination among college students in China.

Fengzhi Zhang, Manman Li, Xiaoxue Li, Hua Bai, Jinling Gao, Hua Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fengzhi Zhang *Department of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 7 Front Kangfu Street, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China. zhangfz2003@zzu.edu.cn.
Manman Li *Department of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 7 Front Kangfu Street, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
Xiaoxue LiDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 7 Front Kangfu Street, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
Hua BaiDepartment of Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 7 Front Kangfu Street, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan Province, China.
Jinling GaoSchool of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Hua LiuSchool of Foreign Languages, Zhongyuan Institute of Science and Technology, Zhengzhou, China.
Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNShanghai Institute for Science of Science · CNZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

Medical Science and Technology Research Project of Henan Province, China LHGJ20190335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women. Up to 99% of cervical cancer cases are associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV). Sexual behavior is a direct risk factor for HPV infection, and sexually active college students, therefore, receive attention for HPV vaccination. At present, most Chinese studies lack of in-depth research on influencing factors, and are limited to cervical cancer, HPV, or HPV vaccine, without comprehensive consideration. This study investigated Chinese college students' cervical cancer prevention and treatment knowledge level, and explored the influencing factors, and understood their willingness to receive HPV vaccination. The findings of this study will lay a foundation for promoting the early screening of cervical cancer and vaccination process.

methodsA total of 800 college students from four universities in Zhengzhou, China were selected by multistage random sampling method. A self-administered questionnaire on the knowledge of cervical cancer prevention and treatment, and willingness to receive HPV vaccination was carried out. A logistic regression model was conducted to analyze factors influencing knowledge of cervical cancer prevention and treatment among college students.

resultsUp to 87.9% of college students said they had heard of cervical cancer. The proportion of college students with good knowledge of cervical cancer prevention and treatment was 46.7%. Logistic regression showed that gender, major, grade, level of education, the father's level of education, premarital sex attitude, and mother cervical cancer screening participation had a significant influence on cervical cancer prevention and treatment knowledge level (P < 0.05). In addition, 589 (74.0%) of college students had heard of HPV vaccine, and 92.8% of college students said they were willing to get vaccinated or recommended that their relatives and friends get vaccinated.

conclusionsThe knowledge level of cervical cancer prevention and treatment knowledge among college students in Zhengzhou is low. Many of them had poor knowledge about HPV vaccine, but their willingness to vaccination is high. Various health education modes should be carried out for people with different characteristics, to improve their knowledge of cervical cancer prevention and promote the vaccination process.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsChinaEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationPapillomavirus VaccinesCervical cancerCollege studentsHPV vaccineWillingness to vaccination

Identifiers

PMID36471351
PMCPMC9721084
OpenAlexW4311287334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.