Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36471340›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2022

Do UK Allied Health Professionals (AHPs) have sufficient guidelines and training to provide telehealth patient consultations?

Enza Leone, Nicola Eddison, Aoife Healy, Carolyn Royse, Nachiappan Chockalingam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Experiences of 'virtual' occupational therapy service delivery in Wales.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2024
    Article
  7. Training needs for staff providing remote services in general practice: a mixed-methods study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Enza LeoneCentre for Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Technologies, Staffordshire University, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3493-0073
Nicola EddisonCentre for Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Technologies, Staffordshire University, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1428-6225
Aoife HealyCentre for Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Technologies, Staffordshire University, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4948-6086
Carolyn RoyseDorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 2JY, United Kingdom.
Nachiappan ChockalingamCentre for Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Technologies, Staffordshire University, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF, United Kingdom. N.Chockalingam@staffs.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7072-1271
University of Staffordshire · GBDorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic caused a rapid shift to remote consultations. United Kingdom (UK) NHS Allied Health Professional (AHP) services may have been unprepared for telehealth implementation. This study explored these services' organisational readiness regarding telehealth guidelines implementation and staff training.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey exploring available telehealth guidelines and staff training was distributed among UK AHPs and AHP service managers between May and June 2021.

results658 participants answered the survey (119 managers and 539 clinicians). Most services, in which telehealth was in place, had implemented telehealth guidelines (clinicians, 64%; managers, 82%), with most guidelines produced by the NHS staff who use them for their consultations. Most clinicians reported that guidelines had ambiguous areas (e.g., regarding protection from litigation and dealing with emergencies), whereas most managers reported the opposite opinion. Guidelines most frequently reported on appropriate telehealth technology and environment for staff and patients, while recommended consultation length and how to conduct telehealth with certain population groups were least reported. Clinicians lacked training in most telehealth aspects, while managers reported that staff training focused on telehealth software and hardware. For both clinicians and managers, training is needed on how to deal with emergencies during telehealth.

conclusionsUK NHS AHP services are not fully equipped with clear and comprehensive guidelines and the skills to deliver telehealth. Vulnerable people are excluded from current guidelines, which may widen health inequalities and hinder the success of the NHS digital transformation. The absence of national guidelines highlights the need for uniform AHP telehealth guidelines.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineAllied Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEmergenciesHumansPandemicsReferral and ConsultationUnited KingdomAllied Health ProfessionalsGuidelinesTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID36471340
PMCPMC9721053
OpenAlexW4311282722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.