Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36471316›Full record

Observational studyBMC geriatrics2022

Measuring frailty and its association with key outcomes in the ambulance setting: a cross sectional observational study.

Karl Charlton, David R Sinclair, Barbara Hanratty, Emma Burrow, Daniel Stow

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A European paramedic curriculum for geriatric emergency medicine developed via a modified Delphi technique.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karl Charlton *North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Ambulance HQ, Bernicia House, Goldcrest Way, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE15 8NY, UK. Karl.Charlton@neas.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9601-1083
David R Sinclair *Population and Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Barbara HanrattyPopulation and Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Emma BurrowNorth East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, Ambulance HQ, Bernicia House, Goldcrest Way, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE15 8NY, UK.
Daniel StowPopulation and Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Newcastle University · GBNorth East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Academic Health Sciences Network (AHSN) North East & North Cumbria (NENC) IPH41
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about frailty in the ambulance setting, or its association with outcomes relevant to ambulance services. We sought to measure frailty in people aged ≥ 50 attended by an ambulance, and describe the relationship between frailty, odds of conveyance to hospital, and duration at scene.

methodsAn observational study between 01/01/2021-30/06/2021 in North East Ambulance Service, England. Participants were aged ≥ 50 attended by an ambulance, excluding patients requiring immediate treatment for a life-threatening condition or with Glasgow Coma Scale < 15. Paramedics (n = 112) measured patient frailty using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Additional information was extracted from ambulance care records. Weighted regression models examined associations between frailty, hospital conveyance, and duration at scene.

resultsThree thousand and fifty-six callouts were observed (mean patient age: 78.1 years, 57.2% female). Frailty prevalence (CFS ≥ 5) was 58.7%. Median duration at scene was 47.0 min (interquartile range 34.0-67.0 min). Ambulances spent a median of 8.2 (95%CI:5.4-11.0) minutes longer with frail patients than non-frail patients. Frail patients were less likely to be conveyed to hospital than non-frail patients (OR:0.75, 95%CI:0.60-0.94).

conclusionFrailty is common among people aged ≥ 50 attended by an ambulance and an important influence on workload. Ambulance services need a good understanding of frailty to meet patient needs. As populations age, community support should be prioritised to deliver appropriate frailty care and reduce demands on ambulance services.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedAmbulancesCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleAmbulanceEpidemiologyFrailtyPublic healthUrgent care

Identifiers

PMID36471316
PMCPMC9721042
OpenAlexW4310676141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.