Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36471314›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies for the initiation of Child Death Review system in Japan: a modified Delphi method study.

Haruko Yatake, Ai Aoki, Atsushi Numaguchi, Kenji Takehara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haruko YatakeDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan. yatake-h@ncchd.go.jp.
Ai AokiDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi NumaguchiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Kenji TakeharaDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare,Japan 19DA1002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo further curb preventable child deaths, some countries have implemented Child Death Review (CDR). CDR is a comprehensive multidisciplinary process that investigates, reviews, and registers all child deaths to consider prevention strategies. This study deciphered the barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies in Japan.

methodsThis study used a three-round modified Delphi method. The expert panel consisted of local government officers and health professionals responsible for the CDR pilot project in Japan. As a modification, the initial list of barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies to address each barrier and facilitator was prepared based on project reports and interviews with local government officers. Throughout the three rounds, the panel evaluated predefined barriers and facilitators, suggested and evaluated additional items, and appraised the potential effectiveness of the implementation strategies on barriers and facilitators which they were meant to address. The importance of barriers and facilitators, and the potential effectiveness of implementation strategies were evaluated using 5-point Likert scale. The priority of the combinations of barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies were determined considering their importance and effectiveness.

resultsA total of 31 experts participated in the panel. Response rates were 96.8%, 80.6%, and 90.3% for the first, second, and third rounds, respectively. A total of 13 barriers, eight facilitators, and 72 implementation strategies corresponding to the barriers and facilitators reached consensus. At the national government level, a barrier-strategy combination of "lack of legislation (barrier)" and "legislation for CDR (strategy)," and a facilitator-strategy combination of "good multi-agency collaboration (facilitator)" and "official notices from the national government (strategy)" were at the highest priority. At the local government level, combinations of "lack of legislation (barrier)" and "constant budget allocations (strategy)," "lack of legislation (barrier)" and "citizens' acceptance (strategy)," and "good multi-agency collaboration (facilitator)" and "appointment of a full-time staff (strategy)" were at the highest priority.

conclusionThis study demonstrated that legislation is the key to better implementation of CDR in Japan. Legislation can address various barriers such as personal information collection, multi-agency collaboration, high workload, and budget instability. Without legislation, careful strategies must be taken to solve difficulties caused by its absence. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: None.

Indexed as

CognitionHealth PersonnelChildDelphi TechniqueHumansJapanPilot ProjectsBarriersChild death reviewChild mortalityFacilitatorsImplementation strategiesJapanPrevention

Identifiers

PMID36471314
PMCPMC9724396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.