Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36471306›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

The mental health and well-being effects of wildfire smoke: a scoping review.

David P Eisenman, Lindsay P Galway

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Health Effects of Wildfire Smoke Exposure.Annual review of medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of Wildland Fire Smoke PMEnvironmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A feminist community-based participatory action research approach to advance climate justice.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2025
    Article
  18. Fire Smoke Elevated the Carbonaceous PMEnvironmental science & technology · 2025
    Article
  19. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  20. Wildfire smoke air pollution: new approaches needed to protect people affected.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David P EisenmanDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Center for Healthy Climate Solutions and Center for Public Health and Disasters, 1100 Glendon Avenue, Suite 850-878, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA. deisenman@mednet.ucla.edu.
Lindsay P GalwayLakehead University Department of Health Sciences, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E1, Canada.
Lakehead University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoke from wildfires is a growing public health risk due to the enormous amount of smoke-related pollution that is produced and can travel thousands of kilometers from its source. While many studies have documented the physical health harms of wildfire smoke, less is known about the effects on mental health and well-being. Understanding the effects of wildfire smoke on mental health and well-being is crucial as the world enters a time in which wildfire smoke events become more frequent and severe. We conducted a scoping review of the existing information on wildfire smoke's impact on mental health and well-being and developed a model for understanding the pathways in which wildfire smoke may contribute to mental health distress.

methodsWe conducted searches using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Google, Scopus, and ProQuest for 1990-2022. These searches yielded 200 articles. Sixteen publications met inclusion criteria following screening and eligibility assessment. Three more publications from the bibliographies of these articles were included for a total of 19 publications.

resultsOur review suggests that exposure to wildfire smoke may have mental health impacts, particularly in episodes of chronic and persistent smoke events, but the evidence is inconsistent and limited. Qualitative studies disclose a wider range of impacts across multiple mental health and well-being domains. The potential pathways connecting wildfire smoke with mental health and well-being operate at multiple interacting levels including individual, social and community networks, living and working conditions, and ecological levels.

conclusionsPriorities for future research include: 1) applying more rigorous methods; 2) differentiating between mental illness and emotional well-being; 3) studying chronic, persistent or repeated smoke events; 4) identifying the contextual factors that set the stage for mental health and well-being effects, and 5) identifying the causal processes that link wildfire smoke to mental health and well-being effects. The pathways model can serve as a basis for further research and knowledge synthesis on this topic. Also, it helps public health, community mental health, and emergency management practitioners mitigate the mental health and well-being harms of wildfire smoke.

Indexed as

Tobacco Smoke PollutionWildfiresEnvironmental ExposureHumansMental HealthPublic HealthTobacco Smoke PollutionBushfireHazeLandscape fireMental healthScoping reviewWell-beingWildfireWildfire smoke

Identifiers

PMID36471306
PMCPMC9724257
OpenAlexW4311201807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.