ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2023
Adaptive visual selection in feature space.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shape-similarity gain: A selection profile for simple objects.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual perception relies on efficient selection of task-relevant information for prioritized processing. A prevalent mode of selection is feature-based selection, and a key question in the literature is the shape of the selection profile-that is, when a feature is selected, what is the landscape of priority for all features in that dimension? Past studies have reported conflicting findings with both monotonic and nonmonotonic profiles. We hypothesized that feature selection can be adaptively adjusted based on stimulus factors (feature competition) and task demands (selection precision). In three experiments, we manipulated these contextual factors in a central task while measuring selection profile in a peripheral task. We found a nonmonotonic, surround suppression, profile when feature competition and selection precision was high, but observed a monotonic profile when these factors were low. Furthermore, manipulation of selection precision alone can shape selection profile independent of feature competition. These findings reconcile previous conflicting results and importantly, demonstrate that feature selection is highly adaptive, allowing flexible allocation of processing resources to ensure efficient extraction of visual information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36471230What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.