Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36471208›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2023

Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Measures of Temporal Pitch Sensitivity in Normal-hearing Listeners.

François Guérit, Andrew J Harland, Matthew L Richardson, Robin Gransier, John C Middlebrooks, Jan Wouters, Robert P Carlyon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Frequency Following Responses to Electric Cochlear Stimulation in an Animal Model.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

François GuéritCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Andrew J HarlandCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Matthew L RichardsonDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Robin GransierDepartment of Neurosciences, ExpORL, Leuven, Belgium.
John C MiddlebrooksDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jan WoutersDepartment of Neurosciences, ExpORL, Leuven, Belgium.
Robert P CarlyonCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England. bob.carlyon@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6166-501X

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To obtain combined behavioural and electrophysiological measures of pitch perception, we presented harmonic complexes, bandpass filtered to contain only high-numbered harmonics, to normal-hearing listeners. These stimuli resemble bandlimited pulse trains and convey pitch using a purely temporal code. A core set of conditions consisted of six stimuli with baseline pulse rates of 94, 188 and 280 pps, filtered into a HIGH (3365-4755 Hz) or VHIGH (7800-10,800 Hz) region, alternating with a 36% higher pulse rate. Brainstem and cortical processing were measured using the frequency following response (FFR) and auditory change complex (ACC), respectively. Behavioural rate change difference limens (DLs) were measured by requiring participants to discriminate between a stimulus that changed rate twice (up-down or down-up) during its 750-ms presentation from a constant-rate pulse train. FFRs revealed robust brainstem phase locking whose amplitude decreased with increasing rate. Moderate-sized but reliable ACCs were obtained in response to changes in purely temporal pitch and, like the psychophysical DLs, did not depend consistently on the direction of rate change or on the pulse rate for baseline rates between 94 and 280 pps. ACCs were larger and DLs lower for stimuli in the HIGH than in the VHGH region. We argue that the ACC may be a useful surrogate for behavioural measures of rate discrimination, both for normal-hearing listeners and for cochlear-implant users. We also showed that rate DLs increased markedly when the baseline rate was reduced to 48 pps, and compared the behavioural and electrophysiological findings to recent cat data obtained with similar stimuli and methods.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsBrain StemHearingPitch DiscriminationPitch PerceptionAuditory change complexEmporal pitch perceptionFrequency following responsePsychophysics

Identifiers

PMID36471208
PMCPMC9971391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.