Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36471182›Full record

Observational studyNeurocritical care2023

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Practice, Treatment, and Effect on Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Marta Baggiani, Francesca Graziano, Paola Rebora, Chiara Robba, Angelo Guglielmi, Stefania Galimberti, Carlo Giussani, Jose I Suarez, Raimund Helbok, Giuseppe Citerio

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Marta BaggianiOspedale Maggiore della Carità di Novara, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Francesca GrazianoDepartment of Health Science, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy.
Paola ReboraDepartment of Health Science, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy.
Chiara RobbaDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, Istituto Di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.
Angelo GuglielmiAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit , Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Stefania GalimbertiDepartment of Health Science, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy.
Carlo GiussaniDepartment of Health Science, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy.
Jose I SuarezDivision of Neurosciences Critical Care, Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Raimund HelbokNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Giuseppe CiterioDepartment of Health Science, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Cadore 48, 20900, Monza, Italy. giuseppe.citerio@unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5374-3161
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITInnsbruck Medical University · ATJohns Hopkins University · USOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and its management in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is variable worldwide. The present study aimed to explore the practice of ICP monitoring, its variability across countries, and the association with 6-month outcomes in aSAH.

methodsThis was a preplanned subanalysis of SYNAPSE-ICU, a multicenter, international, prospective, observational cohort study focused on patients diagnosed with aSAH. We evaluated the variability in ICP monitoring across countries through a logistic regression model adjusted for case-mix and considered countries as a random effect. The association between ICP probe insertion and 6-month mortality and a poor neurological outcome, defined as an Glasgow Outcome Score Extended ≤ 4, was assessed by using a propensity score approach.

resultsA total of 423 patients with aSAH from 92 centers across 32 countries were included in this analysis. ICP monitoring was used in 295 (69.7%) patients. Significant between-country variability in ICP insertion was observed, with an incidence ranging between 4.7% and 79.9% (median odd ratio 3.04). The median duration of ICP monitoring was 12 days (first quartile [Q1] through third quartile [Q3] range 8-18), with an overall daily median ICP value of 14 mm Hg (Q1-Q3 10-19) and a median maximum value of 21 mm Hg (Q1-Q3 16-30). Patients monitored with ICP received more aggressive therapy treatments compared with non-monitored patients (therapy intensity level, TIL, score 10.33 [standard deviation 3.61] vs. 6.3 [standard deviation 4.19], p < 0.001). In more severe patients, ICP monitoring was significantly associated with better 6-month outcome (poor neurological outcome: odds ratio 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.53, p = 0.0113; mortality: hazard ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.49, p < 0.0001). However, no significant effect was observed in patients with both reactive pupils.

conclusionsOur cohort demonstrated high variability in ICP insertion practice among countries. A more aggressive treatment approach was applied in ICP-monitored patients. In patients with severe aSAH, ICP monitoring might reduce unfavorable outcomes and mortality at 6 months.

Indexed as

Subarachnoid HemorrhageHumansIntracranial PressureMonitoring, PhysiologicProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeIntensive care unitIntracranial pressureMortalityOutcomeSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID36471182
OpenAlexW4310779129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.