ArticleNeurosurgical review2022
Transcranial Doppler and computed tomography angiography for detecting cerebral vasospasm post-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the bleed: complications after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Pathophysiology, clinical implications, and management strategies: a review.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a narrative review.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Review
- Outcomes Measures in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research.Translational stroke research · 2025Review
- Contemporary management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. An update for the intensivist.Intensive care medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral vasospasm is a life-threatening complication following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). While digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the current gold standard for detection, the diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and transcranial Doppler (TCD) remains controversial. We aimed to summarize the available evidence and provide recommendations for their use based on GRADE criteria. A literature search was conducted for studies comparing CTA or TCD to DSA for adults ≥ 18 years with aSAH for radiographic vasospasm detection. The DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used to pool sensitivity and specificity and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and derive positive and negative pooled likelihood ratios (LR + /LR -). Out of 2070 studies, seven studies (1646 arterial segments) met inclusion criteria and were meta-analyzed. Compared to the gold standard (DSA), CTA had a pooled sensitivity of 82% (95%CI, 68-91%) and a specificity of 97% (95%CI, 93-98%), while TCD had lower sensitivity 38% (95%CI, 19-62%) and specificity of 91% (95%CI, 87-94%). Only the LR + for CTA (27.3) reached clinical significance to rule in diagnosis. LR - for CTA (0.19) and TCD (0.68) approached clinical significance (< 0.1) to rule out diagnosis. CTA showed higher LR + and lower LR - than TCD for diagnosing radiographic vasospasm, thereby achieving a strong recommendation for its use in ruling in or out vasospasm, based on the high quality of evidence. TCDs had very low LR + and a reasonably low LR - , thereby achieving a weak recommendation against its use in ruling in vasospasm and weak recommendation for its use in ruling out vasospasm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.