Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36471030›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2022

End-to-End Approach to Surfactant Selection, Risk Mitigation, and Control Strategies for Protein-Based Therapeutics.

Annette Medina Morales, Alavattam Sreedhara, Jakob Buecheler, Sebastian Brosig, Danny Chou, Twinkle Christian, Tapan Das, Isabella de Jong, Jonas Fast, Bharat Jagannathan and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Annette Medina MoralesDosage Form Design and Development, BioPharmaceuticals Development, R&D, AstraZeneca, 1 Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20878, USA. annette.medina@astrazeneca.com.
Alavattam SreedharaGenentech, Pharmaceutical Development, South San Francisco, California, 94080, USA.
Jakob BuechelerTechnical Research and Development, Novartis Pharma AG, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Sebastian BrosigTechnical Research and Development, Novartis Pharma AG, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Danny ChouCompassion BioSolution, LLC, Lomita, California, 90717, USA.
Twinkle ChristianAmgen, Process Development, Thousand Oaks, California, 91320, USA.
Tapan DasAnalytical Development and Attribute Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Isabella de JongGenentech, Pharmaceutical Development, South San Francisco, California, 94080, USA.
Jonas FastPharmaceutical Development, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, CH-4070, Basel, Switzerland.
Bharat JagannathanAmgen, Process Development, Thousand Oaks, California, 91320, USA.
Ehab M MoussaDrug Product Development, AbbVie, North Chicago, Illinios, 60064, USA.
M Reza NejadnikDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA.
Indira PrajapatiDosage Form Design and Development, BioPharmaceuticals Development, R&D, AstraZeneca, 1 Medimmune Way, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20878, USA.
Allison RadwickSymbiotix, New York City, New York, 10016, USA.
Yusra RahmanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA.
Shubhadra SinghGlaxoSmithKline R&D, Biopharmaceutical Product Sciences, Collegeville, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19426, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHSunesis (United States) · USUniversity of Iowa · USAbbVie (United States) · USAstraZeneca (France) · FRBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USCompass (United States) · USGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USRoche (Switzerland) · CHSymbiotix Biotherapies (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A survey performed by the AAPS Drug Product Handling community revealed a general, mostly consensus, approach to the strategy for the selection of surfactant type and level for biopharmaceutical products. Discussing and building on the survey results, this article describes the common approach for surfactant selection and control strategy for protein-based therapeutics and focuses on key studies, common issues, mitigations, and rationale. Where relevant, each section is prefaced by survey responses from the 22 anonymized respondents. The article format consists of an overview of surfactant stabilization, followed by a strategy for the selection of surfactant level, and then discussions regarding risk identification, mitigation, and control strategy. Since surfactants that are commonly used in biologic formulations are known to undergo various forms of degradation, an effective control strategy for the chosen surfactant focuses on understanding and controlling the design space of the surfactant material attributes to ensure that the desired material quality is used consistently in DS/DP manufacturing. The material attributes of a surfactant added in the final DP formulation can influence DP performance (e.g., protein stability). Mitigation strategies are described that encompass risks from host cell proteins (HCP), DS/DP manufacturing processes, long-term storage, as well as during in-use conditions.

Indexed as

ExcipientsSurface-Active AgentsLipoproteinsProtein StabilityExcipientsLipoproteinsSurface-Active AgentsControl strategyFormulation stabilityIn use compatibilityPoloxamerPolysorbateSurfactant

Identifiers

PMID36471030
OpenAlexW4310786691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.