Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36470977›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Electronic cigarettes use and 'dual use' among the youth in 75 countries: estimates from Global Youth Tobacco Surveys (2014-2019).

Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy, Kiran Acharya, Anusha Manoharan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Nicotine Dependence in a Banned Market: Biomarker Evidence from E-Cigarette Users in São Paulo, Brazil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. "I Don't Really Understand It All!": A Qualitative Study of Parental Perceptions of Australian Vaping Laws.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Adolescent Perspectives on Their E-Cigarette Initiation Experiences.American journal of health promotion : AJHP · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chandrashekhar T SreeramareddyDepartment of Community Medicine, International Medical University, 126, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. chandrashekharats@yahoo.com.
Kiran AcharyaNew ERA, Rudramati Marga, Kalopul, Kathmandu, 44621, Nepal.
Anusha ManoharanBotanic Health Clinic, Ministry of Health, Selangor, Malaysia.
International Medical University · MYMinistry of Health · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the country-level prevalence of awareness about electronic cigarette use, and 'dual use' and its association with age, sex, country income, and e-cigarette regulatory status. We analyzed the most recent Global Youth Tobacco Surveys done on nationally representative samples of school-going youth aged 13-15 years in 75 countries/territories. The weighted prevalence of 'awareness' (heard about e-cigarettes), 'ever use' (even tried a few puffs), 'current use' (during the last 30 days), and 'dual use' (e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking during the last 30 days) were estimated. Awareness was > 80% in 13 countries mostly from Europe Poland being the highest at 95.8% (95% CI 94.8- 96.6). In seven countries, 30-50% of the youth had ever used an e-cigarette, Italy was the highest at 55.1% (95%CI 51-3,58.9). In 30 countries, current e-cigarette use was > 10%, the highest of 35.1% (95%CI 32.4-38.0) in Guam. Awareness and use were highest in the European region (74.6% and 34.5%) and HIC (83.6% and 39.4%). Youth from HIC (compared to lMIC) and countries having restrictive e-cigarette regulations (compared to NRP) had 2.4 times (aOR 2.2.4, 95% CI 2.2, 2.7) and 1.8 times (aOR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6, 2.0) higher odds of being current e-cigarette users respectively. Youth in countries with the most restrictive e-cigarette regulations (compared to NRP) had 0.6 times lower odds of being current e-cigarette users (aOR 0.6, 95% CI 0.6, 0.7). Awareness and e-cigarette use varied by sex, country income level, and region. Continued global surveillance of youth e-cigarette use is needed for the formulation of e-cigarette regulatory policy. Awareness and use of e-cigarettes were higher among boys, in countries in Europe and America regions, and among those with higher income and restrictive policies, whereas it was lower in countries having the most restrictive policies. Higher awareness is strongly correlated with a trial and current use of e-cigarettes. E-cigarette marketing should be restricted, and continued surveillance of e-cigarette use is needed. Most restrictive policies such as the ban on e-cigarettes appear to reduce e-cigarette use among the youth.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAdolescentHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco Use

Identifiers

PMID36470977
PMCPMC9722706
OpenAlexW4310682271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.