Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36470700›Full record

ArticleIntensive & critical care nursing2023

Family member perspectives on intensive care unit in-person visiting restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.

Linda Jungestrand, Emma Holm, Louise Rose, Axel Wolf, Mona Ringdal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive & critical care nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Beyond the ICU: family resilience and emotional turmoil after intensive care - a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Linda JungestrandKungälvs hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kungälv, Sweden.
Emma HolmSahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Louise RoseFaculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Axel WolfSahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mona RingdalKungälvs hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kungälv, Sweden; Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address: mona.ringdal@fhs.gu.se.
King's College London · GBSahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily member presence in the intensive care unit is important for patient well-being and recovery. Limitations to visits increase the risk of psychological distress in family members. During the COVID-19 pandemic, in-person visiting restrictions were introduced to prevent the spread of infection. PURPOSE: To explore the experience of in-person visiting restrictions imposed during the pandemic on family members of patients with COVID-19 admitted to an intensive care unit.

methodQualitative method with thematic analysis. Individual semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted.

findingsWe interviewed 21 family members. The results are presented in one overall theme with two main themes and five sub-themes. The theme 'Striving for closeness even at a distance describes the experience of being kept at a physical distance when participants needed closeness the most. Even participants who were allowed in-person visits perceived a 'distance' due to personal protective equipment or because they could only view the patient from a window. Participants reported that contact with and information about the patient was of utmost importance. Visits were viewed as essential in providing for the patient's wellbeing. Meaningful contact with the ICU team was vital for getting useful information. Phone calls became a lifeline, with digital aids such as video calls used occasionally to overcome the feeling of distance.

conclusionVisiting restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic made straightforward and comprehensible communication of information from the ICU team more essential to reduce family members' perceptions of distance and exclusion from the intensive care unit.

Indexed as

COVID-19FamilyHumansIntensive Care UnitsPandemicsQualitative ResearchCovid-19ExperiencesFamilyFamily-Centered CareIntensive CareNursingQualitativeRelativeVisitor Restrictions

Identifiers

PMID36470700
PMCPMC9637525
OpenAlexW4308477343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.