Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36470469›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroscience methods2023

A microfluidic perspective on conventional in vitro transcranial direct current stimulation methods.

Han Lu, Sebastian Shaner, Elisabeth Otte, Maria Asplund, Andreas Vlachos

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Han LuDepartment of Neuroanatomy, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Sebastian ShanerBrainLinks-BrainTools Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Elisabeth OtteDepartment of Neuroanatomy, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Maria AsplundBrainLinks-BrainTools Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Division of Nursing and Medical Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden; Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Microtechnology and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address: maria.asplund@chalmers.se.
Andreas VlachosDepartment of Neuroanatomy, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Center for Basics in Neuromodulation (NeuroModulBasics), Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. Electronic address: andreas.vlachos@anat.uni-freiburg.de.
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Investigating the molecular, cellular and circuit effects of transcranial magnetic stimulationR01NS109498 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI FALCHIER, ARNAUD Y, OPITZ, ALEXANDER · 2019 to 2022
$3.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising non-invasive brain stimulation method to treat neurological and psychiatric diseases. However, its underlying neural mechanisms warrant further investigation. Indeed, dose-response interrelations are poorly understood. Placing explanted brain tissue, mostly from mice or rats, into a uniform direct current electric field (dcEF) is a well-established in vitro system to elucidate the neural mechanism of tDCS. Nevertheless, we will show that generating a defined, uniform, and constant dcEF throughout a brain slice is challenging. This article critically reviews the methods used to generate and calibrate a uniform dcEF. We use finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate the widely used parallel electrode configuration and show that it may not reliably generate uniform dcEF within a brain slice inside an open interface or submerged chamber. Moreover, equivalent circuit analysis and measurements inside a testing chamber suggest that calibrating the dcEF intensity with two recording electrodes can inaccurately capture the true EF magnitude in the targeted tissue when specific criteria are not met. Finally, we outline why microfluidic chambers are an effective and calibration-free approach of generating spatiotemporally uniform dcEF for DCS in vitro studies, facilitating accurate and fine-scale dcEF adjustments. We are convinced that improving the precision and addressing the limitations of current experimental platforms will substantially improve the reproducibility of in vitro experimental results. A better mechanistic understanding of dose-response relations will ultimately facilitate more effective non-invasive stimulation therapies in patients.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAnimalsBrainHeadMiceMicrofluidicsRatsReproducibility of Resultsdirect current electric fieldelectrotaxisfinite element analysisin vitrotranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36470469
PMCPMC9884911
OpenAlexW4310733639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.