ArticleDeutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2023
[Clinical and procedural characteristics of patients with acute coronary syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic 2020 compared to a control group from 2019].
Article in Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic medical treatments including emergencies were often delayed, in part because of fear of an infection with Sars-CoV-2. Even patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were affected by these circumstances. In the present study we provide a systematic comparison of patients with ACS during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to a control group.
methodsThis is a retrospective cross-sectional study including all patients admitted with an ACS (STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina) undergoing coronary angiography between March 2019 and June 2019 (group A) and between March 2020 and June 2020 (group B). Demographic factors, cardiovascular risk factors and procedural data (extent of coronary disease, clinical diagnose, revascularisation strategy and outcome, use of mechanical support devices, door-to-needle time and in-hospital mortality) were compared.
results469 patients were included in the present study (239 patients in group A and 230 in group B, mean age 69 years, 71% male). Compared to group A there were fewer patients with STEMI and unstable angina (p=0,033) but more patients with NSTEMI (p=0,047) in group B. Patients in group B had less often single vessel disease (p=0,001) but in contrast more often triple vessel disease compared to group A (p=0,052).
conclusionDespite overall comparable numbers of ACS patients those admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic were more frequently diagnosed with NSTEMI and had a larger extent of coronary disease compared to a control group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.