Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36469902›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of medicine2023

Biological Phenotyping in Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Pratik Sinha, Nuala J Meyer, Carolyn S Calfee

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pratik SinhaDivision of Clinical & Translational Research and Division of Critical Care, Department of Anesthesia, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; email: p.sinha@wustl.edu.
Nuala J MeyerDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine; Center for Translational Lung Biology; and Lung Biology Institute, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Carolyn S CalfeeDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy & Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Precision Medicine in the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeR35HL140026 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CALFEE, CAROLYN · 2018 to 2024
$6.8M
Investigating Individual Susceptibility and Host Response in Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeR35HL161196 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Nuala Jennings Meyer · 2022 to 2026
$4.8M
Precision Medicine in Sepsis with Critical IllnessR35GM142992 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Pratik Sinha · 2021 to 2026
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL140026NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL161196NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterogeneity in sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is increasingly being recognized as one of the principal barriers to finding efficacious targeted therapies. The advent of multiple high-throughput biological data ("omics"), coupled with the widespread access to increased computational power, has led to the emergence of phenotyping in critical care. Phenotyping aims to use a multitude of data to identify homogenous subgroups within an otherwise heterogenous population. Increasingly, phenotyping schemas are being applied to sepsis and ARDS to increase understanding of these clinical conditions and identify potential therapies. Here we present a selective review of the biological phenotyping schemas applied to sepsis and ARDS. Further, we outline some of the challenges involved in translating these conceptual findings to bedside clinical decision-making tools.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeSepsisHumansacute respiratory distress syndromeARDScritical carephenotypesprecision medicinesepsissubphenotypes

Identifiers

PMID36469902
PMCPMC10617629
OpenAlexW4310779572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.