Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36469530›Full record

Observational studyThe British journal of surgery2023

Mapping population access to essential surgical care in Liberia using equipment, personnel, and bellwether capability standards.

Håvard A Adde, Alex J van Duinen, Benetta C Andrews, Juul Bakker, Kezelebah S Goyah, Øyvind Salvesen, Swaliho Sheriff, Terseer Utam, Clarence Yaskey, Thomas G Weiser and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The British journal of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Håvard A AddeDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0883-0549
Alex J van DuinenDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6943-0100
Benetta C AndrewsLiberia College of Physicians and Surgeons, Monrovia, Liberia.
Juul BakkerDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Kezelebah S GoyahLifebox Foundation, Monrovia, Liberia.
Øyvind SalvesenDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Swaliho SheriffLifebox Foundation, Monrovia, Liberia.
Terseer UtamLifebox Foundation, Monrovia, Liberia.
Clarence YaskeyLifebox Foundation, Monrovia, Liberia.
Thomas G WeiserDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3118-3888
Håkon A BolkanDepartment of Surgery, St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity of Liberia · LRNational Public Health Institute of Liberia · LRStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate surveillance of population access to essential surgery is key for strategic healthcare planning. This study aimed to estimate population access to surgical facilities meeting standards for safe surgery equipment, specialized surgical personnel, and bellwether capability, cesarean delivery, emergency laparotomy, and long-bone fracture fixation and to evaluate the validity of using these standards to describe the full breadth of essential surgical care needs in Liberia.

methodAn observational study of surgical facilities was conducted in Liberia between 20 September and 8 November 2018. Facility data were combined with geospatial data and analysed in an online visualization platform.

resultsData were collected from 51 of 52 surgical facilities. Nationally, 52.9 per cent of the population (2 392 000 of 4 525 000 people) had 2-h access to their closest surgical facility, whereas 41.1 per cent (1 858 000 people) and 48.6 per cent (2 199 000 people) had 2-h access to a facility meeting the personnel and equipment standards respectively. Six facilities performed all bellwether procedures; 38.7 per cent of the population (1 751 000 people) had 2-h access to one of these facilities. Bellwether-capable facilities were more likely to perform other essential surgical procedures (OR 3.13, 95 per cent c.i. 1.28 to 7.65; P = 0.012). These facilities delivered a median of 13.0 (i.q.r. 11.3-16.5) additional essential procedures.

conclusionPopulation access to essential surgery is limited in Liberia; strategies to reduce travel times ought to be part of healthcare policy. Policymakers should also be aware that bellwether capability might not be a valid proxy for the full breadth of essential surgical care in low-income settings.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityLaparotomyCesarean SectionFemaleHumansLiberiaPregnancyTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID36469530
PMCPMC10364551
OpenAlexW4310703109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.