ArticleCancer research2023
Estimation of Neutral Mutation Rates and Quantification of Somatic Variant Selection Using cancereffectsizeR.
Article in Cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variant-Specific Landscape of Mutual Exclusivity Among BRAF, EGFR, and KRAS Oncogenes Reveals Overlap With Functionally Antagonistic Mutant Pairs.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Empowering Inference of Epistasis on the Basis of Mutual Exclusivity, Co-Occurrence, Functional Antagonism and Synergy in ERK-Pathway Oncogenes.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Pervasive tissue specificity of driver genes revealed by mutational analysis of 265 cancer types.iScience · 2026Article
- A comparative mutation-selection reanalysis of colon and rectal adenocarcinoma highlights PIK3CA variants and BRAF V600E.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Accelerating discovery of cancer causes for prevention in the era of rising early-onset cancers.Cell · 2026Review
- Gene duplication is associated with gene diversification and potential neofunctionalization in lung cancer evolution.Genome research · 2026Article
- Evaluating the prognostic value of mutational signatures in small-cell lung cancer through reference-based signature assignment and continuous activity analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Divergent evolution of hepatocellular carcinoma genomes in chimpanzees and humans.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2026Article
- Driver mutation impact in Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma.PloS one · 2026Article
- EarlybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- DiffInvex identifies evolutionary shifts in driver gene repertoires during tumorigenesis and chemotherapy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Glioma mutational signatures associated with haloalkane exposure are enriched in firefighters.Cancer · 2025Article
- Rare Drivers at Low Prevalence with High Cancer Effects in T-Cell and B-Cell Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- FAT4 Mutation is Related to Tumor Mutation Burden and Favorable Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.Current genomics · 2024Article
- Pairwise and higher-order epistatic effects among somatic cancer mutations across oncogenesis.Mathematical biosciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Somatic nucleotide mutations can contribute to cancer cell survival, proliferation, and pathogenesis. Although research has focused on identifying which mutations are "drivers" versus "passengers," quantifying the proliferative effects of specific variants within clinically relevant contexts could reveal novel aspects of cancer biology. To enable researchers to estimate these cancer effects, we developed cancereffectsizeR, an R package that organizes somatic variant data, facilitates mutational signature analysis, calculates site-specific mutation rates, and tests models of selection. Built-in models support effect estimation from single nucleotides to genes. Users can also estimate epistatic effects between paired sets of variants, or design and test custom models. The utility of cancer effect was validated by showing in a pan-cancer dataset that somatic variants classified as likely pathogenic or pathogenic in ClinVar exhibit substantially higher effects than most other variants. Indeed, cancer effect was a better predictor of pathogenic status than variant prevalence or functional impact scores. In addition, the application of this approach toward pairwise epistasis in lung adenocarcinoma showed that driver mutations in BRAF, EGFR, or KRAS typically reduce selection for alterations in the other two genes. Companion reference data packages support analyses using the hg19 or hg38 human genome builds, and a reference data builder enables use with any species or custom genome build with available genomic and transcriptomic data. A reference manual, tutorial, and public source code repository are available at https://townsend-lab-yale.github.io/cancereffectsizeR. Comprehensive estimation of cancer effects of somatic mutations can provide insights into oncogenic trajectories, with implications for cancer prognosis and treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: An R package provides streamlined, customizable estimation of underlying nucleotide mutation rates and of the oncogenic and epistatic effects of mutations in cancer cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.