ArticleJAMA network open2022
Association of Recreational Cannabis Legalization With Cannabis Possession Arrest Rates in the US.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic ΔBritish journal of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Knowledge and attitudes toward recreational cannabis legalization among California residents: a population-matched questionnaire about Proposition 64.Journal of cannabis research · 2025Article
- Drug Decriminalization and Fatal Traffic Crashes: Evidence From BM110 in Oregon.Health economics · 2025Article
- Cannabis use, health problems, and criminal offences in Germany: national and state-level trends between 2009 and 2021.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of the Positive Outcomes of Cannabis Use Scale (POCUS) Among Predominantly White Adults in the United States.Assessment · 2025Article
- Same Story, Different Seller: Teaching the Public How Cannabis Models Driven by Profit Create the Same Injustices as Prohibition.Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.) · 2025Article
- Missouri College Students' Intentions Towards Initiating or Changing Cannabis Use in a Shifting Legal Landscape.Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.) · 2025Article
- Changes in legal referrals to specialty substance use disorder treatment from 2015-2019.Health & justice · 2024Article
- Neuromodulation for Cannabis Use: A Scoping Review.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Recreational cannabis legalization and immigration enforcement: a state-level analysis of arrests and deportations in the United States, 2009-2020.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Associations between cannabis policies and state-level specialty cannabis use disorder treatment in the United States, 2004-2019.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2024Article
- Trends of emergency department visits for cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome in Nevada: An interrupted time series analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Perception of Risks of Cannabis and Cannabidiol Use during Pregnancy: A Multi-Methods Study.Medical cannabis and cannabinoidsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Recreational cannabis legalization (RCL) has been advocated as a way to reduce the number of individuals interacting with the US criminal justice system; in theory, however, cannabis decriminalization can achieve this objective without generating the negative public health consequences associated with RCL. It is still unclear whether RCL can bring additional benefits in terms of reducing cannabis possession arrests in states that have already decriminalized cannabis. Objective: To examine whether RCL was associated with changes in cannabis possession arrests in US states that had already decriminalized cannabis during the study period and whether these changes differed across age and racial subgroups. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional study used cannabis possession arrest data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCRP) for US states from 2010 through 2019. Statistical analysis was conducted from October 6, 2021, to October 12, 2022. Exposures: Implementation of statewide RCL. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cannabis possession arrest rates per 1000 population per year were assessed with a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design and were used to estimate the association of RCL with arrest rates in RCL states that had or had not decriminalized cannabis before RCL. This association was also examined in subgroups for age (adults vs youths) and race (Black vs White). Results: This study included UCRP data for 31 US states, including 9 states that implemented RCL during the study period (4 without and 5 with decriminalization) and 22 non-RCL states. In the 4 states that had not decriminalized cannabis before legalization, RCL was associated with a 76.3% decrease (95% CI, -81.2% to -69.9%) in arrest rates among adults. In the 5 states that had already decriminalized cannabis, RCL was still associated with a substantial decrease in adult arrest rates (-40.0%; 95% CI, -55.1% to -19.8%). There was no association of RCL with changes in arrest rates among youths. In addition, changes in arrest rates associated with RCL did not differ among Black and White individuals. Conclusions and Relevance: In this repeated cross-sectional study, RCL was associated with a sizable reduction in cannabis possession arrests among adults in states that had already decriminalized cannabis during the study period (2010-2019), albeit the magnitude was smaller compared with states that had not decriminalized cannabis before RCL. In addition, RCL did not seem to be associated with changes in arrest rates among youths or disparities in arrest rates among Black and White individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.