ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2022
Fracture distribution in postmenopausal women: a FRISBEE sub-study.
Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lumbopelvic Stabilization with Two Methods of Triangular Osteosynthesis: A Biomechanical Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Paradoxical Association of Lipids with Survival and Walking Ability of Hip Fractures in Geriatric Patients After Surgery: A 1-Year Follow-Up Study.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We registered 1336 incident-validated fractures in a prospective cohort of 3560 postmenopausal (60-85 years) Belgian women (mean follow-up of 9.1 years). The increase of fracture incidence with age varied widely depending on the fracture site and was significantly steeper for central than for peripheral fractures (e.g., not significant for the ankle).
introductionThe epidemiology of fracture sites other than MOFs has been less studied. We examined the incidence of fractures according to their sites in a prospective cohort of postmenopausal Belgian women.
methodsThree thousand five hundred sixty postmenopausal women, aged 60-85 years old, were recruited from 2007 to 2013 and surveyed yearly (FRISBEE). The number of validated incident fractures was recorded and analyzed in relation to age and the fracture site.
resultsOne thousand three hundred thirty-six fractures were recorded after a mean follow-up of 9.1 years. Seven hundred fifty-six fractures (57%) were MOFs and 580 (43%) non-MOFs, while 813 (61%) were central and 523 (39%) peripheral. The increase of fracture incidence with age differed between fracture sites and was steeper for central than for peripheral fractures. The ratio of MOFs to non-MOFs increased significantly with age, from 1.10 (95% CI: 0.83-1.45) for the 60-69 to 1.69 [1.42-2.01] for the 80-89-year subgroup (P = 0.017). This was also true for central versus peripheral fracture. We differentiated three groups of fracture incidence evolution with age: fractures with a mean increase/decade (compared to the 60-69 age group) of less than 1.5, 1.5-2.0, and 2.0-3.0. The lowest increase was seen for most peripheral fractures, whereas the greatest increase included hip, scapula, pelvis, ribs, and spine fractures.
conclusionThe increase of fracture incidence with age varied widely depending on the fracture site, and the ratio of MOFs to non-MOFs rose significantly with age. Some peripheral fractures, such as the ankle, did not increase significantly with age, suggesting that bone fragility does not play a major role in their occurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36469184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.