ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Conservative treatment of trauma-associated fractures of the cervical spine with orthoses-A review].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Conservative treatment of injuries to the cervical spine : Mobilization or immobilization].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic injuries of the cervical spine are common and can significantly differ in the prognosis and treatment depending on the structure affected. We present the current evidence for conservative treatment of these fractures with orthoses in this review. METHODOLOGY: The literature search followed the PRISMA protocol. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS‑I and evidence levels were determined according to AHCPR.
resultsA total of 22 studies were identified. The level of evidence according to AHCPR is limited (IIb, III and IV) and every study had a serious risk of bias in at least one subdivision. Of the authors 11 presented conservative treatment concepts for C2 dens fractures, 7 studies focussed on vertebral arch fractures and 9 on vertebral body fractures. Radiological parameters (kyphosis angle, bone consolidation) and the neurological status were frequently reported as endpoints.
conclusionStable C2 dens fractures without relevant clinical restrictions allow conservative treatment in a rigid cervical orthosis under radiological monitoring every 1-4 weeks. Type II fractures require special attention due to the risk of instability. Hangman's fractures can be safely treated in rigid cervical orthoses. The current state of knowledge does not allow any recommendation for conservative treatment of Hangman's fractures with orthoses. Stable vertebral body fractures without involvement of the spinal canal can also be treated conservatively with orthotic devices. Randomized controlled studies are required to develop a secure state of evidence and are currently not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.