Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36468832›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Effects of dopamine D2/3 and opioid receptor antagonism on the trade-off between model-based and model-free behaviour in healthy volunteers.

Nace Mikus, Sebastian Korb, Claudia Massaccesi, Christian Gausterer, Irene Graf, Matthäus Willeit, Christoph Eisenegger, Claus Lamm, Giorgia Silani, Christoph Mathys

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. A dopaminergic basis of behavioral control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Nace MikusDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3445-9464
Sebastian KorbDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3517-3783
Claudia MassaccesiDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0519-6324
Christian GaustererFDZ-Forensisches DNA Zentrallabor GmbH, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4875-5459
Irene GrafDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Matthäus WilleitDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph EiseneggerDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Claus LammDepartment of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5422-0653
Giorgia Silani *Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4284-3618
Christoph Mathys *Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4079-5453
University of Vienna · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATScuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati · ITUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human behaviour requires flexible arbitration between actions we do out of habit and actions that are directed towards a specific goal. Drugs that target opioid and dopamine receptors are notorious for inducing maladaptive habitual drug consumption; yet, how the opioidergic and dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems contribute to the arbitration between habitual and goal-directed behaviour is poorly understood. By combining pharmacological challenges with a well-established decision-making task and a novel computational model, we show that the administration of the dopamine D2/3 receptor antagonist amisulpride led to an increase in goal-directed or 'model-based' relative to habitual or 'model-free' behaviour, whereas the non-selective opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone had no appreciable effect. The effect of amisulpride on model-based/model-free behaviour did not scale with drug serum levels in the blood. Furthermore, participants with higher amisulpride serum levels showed higher explorative behaviour. These findings highlight the distinct functional contributions of dopamine and opioid receptors to goal-directed and habitual behaviour and support the notion that even small doses of amisulpride promote flexible application of cognitive control.

Indexed as

DopamineNarcotic AntagonistsAmisulprideDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsHealthy VolunteersHumansReceptors, OpioidAmisulprideDopamineDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsNarcotic AntagonistsReceptors, Opioidcognitive controldecision-makinghumanneurosciencereinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID36468832
PMCPMC9721617
OpenAlexW4310962848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.