ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Segmentation and differentiation of periventricular and deep white matter hyperintensities in 2D T2-FLAIR MRI based on a cascade U-net.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral small vessel disease lesion segmentation methods: A systematic review.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2025Review
- Profiling of N6-methyladenosine methylation in porcine longissimus dorsi muscle and unravelling the hub gene ADIPOQ promotes adipogenesis in an mJournal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are a subtype of cerebral small vessel disease and can be divided into periventricular WMHs (pvWMHs) and deep WMHs (dWMHs). pvWMHs and dWMHs were proved to be determined by different etiologies. This study aimed to develop a 2D Cascade U-net (Cascade U) for the segmentation and differentiation of pvWMHs and dWMHs on 2D T2-FLAIR images. Methods: A total of 253 subjects were recruited in the present study. All subjects underwent 2D T2-FLAIR scan on a 3.0 Tesla MR scanner. Both contours of pvWMHs and dWMHs were manually delineated by the observers and considered as the gold standard. Fazekas scale was used to evaluate the burdens of pvWMHs and dWMHs, respectively. Cascade U consisted of a segmentation U-net and a differentiation U-net and was trained with a combined loss function. The performance of Cascade U was compared with two other U-net models (Pipeline U and Separate U). Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), precision, and recall were used to evaluate the performances of all models. The linear correlations between WMHs volume (WMHV) measured by all models and the gold standard were also conducted. Results: Compared with other models, Cascade U exhibited a better performance on WMHs segmentation and pvWMHs identification. Cascade U achieved DSC values of 0.605 ± 0.135, 0.517 ± 0.263, and 0.510 ± 0.241 and MCC values of 0.617 ± 0.122, 0.526 ± 0.263, and 0.522 ± 0.243 on the segmentation of total WMHs, pvWMHs, and dWMHs, respectively. Cascade U exhibited strong correlations with the gold standard on measuring WMHV (R Conclusion: Cascade U showed competitive results in segmentation and differentiation of pvWMHs and dWMHs on 2D T2-FLAIR images, indicating potential feasibility in precisely evaluating the burdens of WMHs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.